Letter: Since a revenue-raising bill originated in the Senate, isn't it null and void?
The recent so-called "fiscal cliff" deal included a tax hike on the "rich." The Constitution of the United States requires "All Bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives."
Shutterstock
The recent so-called "fiscal cliff" deal included a tax hike on the "rich." The Constitution of the United States requires "All Bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives."
Since this revenue-raising bill originated in the Senate, isn't this entire bill illegal and therefore null and void? Would the fabrication of and voting for an illegal bill fall under the classification of "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" for which impeachment is the appropriate remedy? (Art II, Sect 4)
Henry Todd
Provo
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Dan Liljenquist: Chaffetz's search for truth...
- Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in America's...
- In our opinion: Frances B. Monson's...
- Michael Gerson: As government's ambitions...
- What others say: Assault on core values
- Letters: Deception and government
- Letters: Paycheck Fairness Act
- My view: Climate argument is shortsighted
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion



You want to impeach Mitch McConnell?
Ok... hold on. For the last 4 years all we have heard is that the Senate and Obama are to blame for us not having a budget.... are you now saying now the sole responsibility for the budget is the Houses..... are we attempting to have our cake, More..
Obviously you don't understand the process - which they did follow. The House passed the bill in August 2012 (that's 4 months previously!!). When they pass a bill, it goes to the Senate to either pass it "as is" (which never More..