Second, as an end in itself. Fundamentally, Obama is a leveler. The community organizer seeks, above all, to reverse the growing inequality that he dates and attributes to ruthless Reaganism. Now, however, clothed in the immense powers of the presidency, he can actually engage in unadorned redistributionism. As in Tuesday night's $620 billion wealth transfer.
Upon losing the House in 2010, the leveler took cover for the next two years. He wasn't going to advance his real agenda through the Republican House anyway, and he needed to win re-election.
Now he's won. The old Obama is back. He must not be underestimated. He has deftly leveraged his class-war-themed election victory (a) to secure a source of funding (albeit still small) for the bloated welfare state, (b) to carry out an admirably candid bit of income redistribution and (c) to fracture the one remaining institutional obstacle to the rest of his ideological agenda.
Not bad for two months' work.
Charles Krauthammer's email address is letters@charleskrauthammer.com.
- My view: MMR vaccine caused my son's autism
- Letters: Move to the center
- My view: UDOT listened, made a good choice
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should keep up...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- In our opinion: Utah's caucus system needs...
- Dan Liljenquist: IRS scandal is an assault on...
- Facts about the Boy Scouts of America
- Letters: No welfare, ever
77 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
33 - Letters: Move to the center
32 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
32 - Richard Davis: Abortion laws should...
28 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
27 - Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem...
21 - Dan Liljenquist: IRS scandal is an...
20



Another partisan hack job from Dr. Chuckles. He's a cranky ideologue still sulking about the election.
Of course. Blame the President for the Republican inability to perform.
Talk, talk, talk. Republicans talk about cutting spending, but never identify specific cuts, and consequently never pass a spending cut bill for the President to More..
Remember how Charles claimed that the war in Iraq was necessary and that we'd find WMDs there? Or remember when he claimed that we needed to invade Iran? Or when he said that we needed to let all the banks fail? Or that the car stimulus and More..