Customers walk into a Hobby Lobby Thursday, Nov. 1, 2012, in Dallas. An attorney for Hobby Lobby Stores said Thursday that the arts and crafts chain plans to defy a federal mandate requiring it to offer employees health coverage that includes access to the morning-after pill, despite risking potential fines of up to $1.3 million per day.
Tony Gutierrez, ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON — An attorney for Hobby Lobby Stores said Thursday that the arts and crafts chain plans to defy a federal mandate requiring it to offer employees health coverage that includes access to the morning-after pill, despite risking potential fines of up to $1.3 million per day.
Hobby Lobby and religious book-seller Mardel Inc., which are owned by the same conservative Christian family, are suing to block part of the federal health care law that requires employee health-care plans to provide insurance coverage for the morning-after pill and similar emergency contraception pills.
The companies claim the mandate violates the religious beliefs of their owners. They say the morning-after pill is tantamount to abortion because it can prevent a fertilized egg from becoming implanted in a woman's womb.
On Wednesday, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied the companies' request for an injunction while their lawsuit is pending, saying the stores failed to satisfy the demanding legal standard for blocking the requirement on an emergency basis. She said the companies may still challenge the regulations in the lower courts.
Kyle Duncan, who is representing Hobby Lobby on behalf of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, said in a statement posted on the group's website Thursday that Hobby Lobby doesn't intend to offer its employees insurance that would cover the drug while its lawsuit is pending.
"The company will continue to provide health insurance to all qualified employees," Duncan said. "To remain true to their faith, it is not their intention, as a company, to pay for abortion-inducing drugs."
In ruling against the companies last month, U.S. District Judge Joe Heaton said churches and other religious organizations have been granted constitutional protection from the birth-control provisions but that "Hobby Lobby and Mardel are not religious organizations."
- Funeral services for Sister Frances J. Monson...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- Amy Donaldson: LDS boxer B.J. Flores hopes...
- Hundreds of teens in Southern California go...
- Woman told she would never walk, talk defies...
- Muslim leaders in U.S. facing challenges...
- Mormon NFL safety Eric Weddle: Balancing...
- 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah Scout...
- Mormon NFL safety Eric Weddle:...
68 - Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet,...
66 - Community of Christ recommends...
23 - Muslim leaders in U.S. facing...
22 - Hundreds watch as Angel Moroni statue...
17 - LDS Church is smart to reach out to...
14 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
12 - Defending the Faith: The first missions...
12



As a small business owner, I would never enforce my religious views on my employee's! Do the owners want all of their employee's to act and practice the same way they do?
Claiming that religious people must be a religious organization to be able to live their lives according to their principles and beliefs is an outrageous example of how people can rationalize violating the rights of individuals. The Constitution does More..
amazing what the Obama administration is getting away with. This country needs more children not fewer. There won't be anyone to pay for the debt.