So what would happen if the Republicans couple the spending cuts they seek with the tax rate reductions on the 98 percent that President Obama and his Democrats seek? If that coupled offering does not get passed, who is to blame?
Shutterstock
Most of what I read these days suggests that the no-deal automatic tax rate increases as of Jan. 1, 2013, are almost inevitable. Then, there will be a subsequent effort to lower tax rates for the non-rich. If the Republicans stymie President Obama's efforts, he will try to place the blame on them alone.
So what would happen if the Republicans couple the spending cuts they seek with the tax rate reductions on the 98 percent that President Obama and his Democrats seek? If that coupled offering does not get passed, who is to blame? Each side will blame the other, and both will be correct. But this kind of compromise is exactly what is needed to mitigate the coming cliff/mountain disasters that we truly and clearly do face.
It seems that the only way, politically, to get to such a compromise is to let the Jan. 1 changes occur, then get busy on rational adjustments to both spending and revenue generation in a composite bill that will significantly increase the growth prospects for the overall economy. Then both sides can claim political victory, and we can get on with serious economic recovery.
John Nagel
Holladay
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- Top scandals and controversies of each US...
- In our opinion: Scouting success will come...
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus vote
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Robert Bennett: With public trust waning,...
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
- Letters: No welfare, ever
59 - Letters: Deception and government
31 - Letter: The real death panel:...
30 - In our opinion: Reduce the legal...
26 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
25 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
24 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
24 - Letters: Paycheck Fairness Act
21



At least if we fall off the fiscal cliff on Jan. 1 and then reduce tax rates for the 98% back to 2012 levels, the Republicans can remain loyal to their pledge to Grover Norquist not to raise taxes, since sequestration will do that without an More..
All of the people claiming that the deficit is their biggest concern should be happy about the fiscal cliff, after all it cuts the deficit in half in one fell swoop. People who want to avoid the cliff should be honest enough to admit that they favor More..
Those suggesting we let the fiscal cliff become a reality first have never had to deal with the consequences of even hinting such a thing will happen. In the recent past the threat of government shutdowns during the debate about raising the debt More..