In this Thursday, Dec. 30, 2010 file photo, workers repair electrical wires along the banks of the Ganges River in Allahabad, India.
Associated Press
While a debate on human-caused climate change has virtually ended among experts, the Deseret News found an author who put up feeble con arguments in a pro/con juxtaposition of articles. Amy Ridenour, a representative of an ideologically-driven think tank, relied on unproven arguments ("Global warming isn't happening") that have been recycled for years by climate change deniers ("Wrong of Obama and Romney to dismiss Climate Change?" Nov.11).
The majority of Americans are listening to the climate scientists, observing what is happening around them, and concluding that the climate is changing. They see unprecedented heat, drought, precipitation and floods, like hurricane Sandy, as dramatic evidence. Now, rather than continuing to debate the issue, they are looking for solutions.
The day after these pro/con opinions were published, the Yale Project on Climate Change Communications released its most recent survey report. It found that 77 percent of Americans say global warming should be a priority, and 92 percent say the president and Congress should make developing sources of clean energy a priority.
Let's accept what the majority of experts are telling us about human-caused climate change and work together for solutions.
David Folland
Sandy
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- In our opinion: Frances B. Monson's...
- Dan Liljenquist: Chaffetz's search for truth...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will...
- My view: One woman's story of redemption...
- Letter: The real death panel: Republican...
- Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in America's...
- George F. Will: President Obama's new...



DougS: "What experts? Most, including Al Gore have been shown to have used skewed data in their findings."
That is completely untrue.
The scientific evidence connecting fossil fuels to global warming is mounting every More..
I admit I'm not a scientist so I have no independent knowledge (i.e. I haven't personally read any of the studies or analyzed the data). However, given the choice of whether to believe 99% of scientists who study this issue vs. the More..
If denying man's influence on global climate patterns means we don't have to do anything about it, we'll be there, and no science is going to get in the way.