In this Thursday, April 29, 2010 file photo, a pair of coal trains idle on the tracks near Dry Fork Station.
Associated Press
New York reports 10,000 to 40,000 people uprooted because of hurricane Sandy, as a second storm, a cold Nor'easter, marched in. Sandy exemplifies a series of extreme events — heat waves, wildfires, droughts and floods — of surprising violence and frequency. The human and environmental impacts are severe.
So are the economic consequences. Munich Re, a major reinsurer, stated last month: "Nowhere in the world is the rising number of natural catastrophes more evident than in North America. ... For the period concerned — 1980 to 2011 — the overall loss burden from weather catastrophes was US $1,060 bn."
Increasingly, the public understands surprisingly severe and frequent natural disasters as footprints of climate change, and recognizes that we'll see many more if we don't sharply reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that heat up the earth.
We need to help the victims of Sandy now, whose needs are achingly before us. And just as surely, we need to step away from burning coal, oil and gas by placing a fee on carbon, and returning revenue to the public to offset higher costs. Let's move decisively on this. We need to leave some footprints of our own.
Robert Speiser
Salt Lake City
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- Robert Bennett: With public trust waning,...
- Top scandals and controversies of each US...
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- About Utah: Without fanfare, the National...
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
52 - Letters: Deception and government
31 - Letter: The real death panel:...
29 - In our opinion: Reduce the legal...
26 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
25 - Letters: Paycheck Fairness Act
20 - Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in...
20 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
18



Surely the letter writer understands that Conservatives, once again, will come out STRONGLY against one of their own ideas.
What was once championed as a market based approach to pollution and was pushed by G HW Bush, is now panned as a More..
A carbon tax makes a lot of sense because it addresses the problem of what economists refer to as "hidden costs."
The true cost of carbon-based energy would include the cost of the damage caused by global warming which results More..
higv,
How about actually _contributing_ to the discussion for a change?
You think people won't drive personal automobiles if we place a higher economic value on the vehicle efficiency?
You think people will stop More..