Ignore the trimmers. There's no need for radical change. The other party thinks it owns the demographic future — counter that in one stroke by fixing the Latino problem. Do not, however, abandon the party's philosophical anchor. In a world where European social democracy is imploding before our eyes, the party of smaller, more modernized government owns the —eological future.
Romney is a good man who made the best argument he could, and nearly won. He would have made a superb chief executive, but he (like the Clinton machine) could not match Barack Obama in the darker arts of public persuasion.
The answer to Romney's failure is not retreat, not aping the Democrats' patchwork pandering. It is to make the case for restrained, rationalized and reformed government in stark contradistinction to Obama's increasingly unsustainable big-spending, big-government paternalism.
Republicans: No whimpering. No whining. No reinvention when none is needed. Do conservatism, but do it better. There's a whole generation of leaders ready to do just that.
Charles Krauthammer's email address is letters@charleskrauthammer.com.
- In our opinion: Scouting success will come...
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus vote
- Lois M. Collins: Kids' summer 'bucket list'...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- Letters: Government, health care
- Search for extraterrestrial life goes on,...
- Letters: No welfare, ever
68 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus...
31 - Letter: The real death panel:...
30 - Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
29 - In our opinion: Big screen exploitation...
25 - Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in...
20 - Charles Krauthammer: Americans deserve...
17 - Michael Gerson: As government's...
15



The GOP's "don't be a 47% leech" message doesn't resonate well with many, and I'm not sure trotting our Rubio or Ted Cruz will be enough to stem the demographic shift for Republicans.
I was a 47 percenter when I More..
Krauthammer is, again, irrelevant. His belief that Republicans need not adjust to a changing world runs counter to the notion of making the Republican Party an important force in the areea of political ideas. He is truly the reactionary voice in More..
Krauthammer is, once again, showing that he doesn't have a clue.