It is critical for the citizenry to understand the Obama vision for growing the market economy cannot succeed in four more years. The pinnacle of their success, "GM is still alive," was accomplished by restructuring through managed bankruptcy, which is exactly what Mitt Romney proposed.
Jobs were lost, and contracting companies and dealerships were cut out. The difference is instead of permitting private capital to assume the risk and courts to assume the restructuring, failed management did it with taxpayer money. Each job "saved" cost millions; as a major owner, government still subsidizes GM.
The other side of the Obama vision is to stimulate the economy with large government grants and guarantees (noticeably to donors of large political gifts) for favored industrial projects. The creation, course and demise of Newsmax, Solyndra, other failed companies and absence of shovel-ready jobs have fizzled away huge sums of tax revenue. The policy bets on the brilliance of a few to know what's best for America; the risk is absorbed in public debt. Subsidizing failure is the wrong direction.
It will not grow the market economy in four more years — not in 40 more years.
Salt Lake City
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- Doug Robinson: Violence against women is...
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act needs...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- My view: Balancing personal conviction... 54
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 46
- Letter: Policy disagreement 45
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 36