Since the summer, both campaigns have been the flip sides of the same analysis: For Obama, avoid talking about the performance of the economy and destroy Romneys credibility. For Romney, talk about the economy and establish that he is not a monster. Neither approach will be remembered for its creativity. There is no reason that Obama could not have added a more compelling second-term agenda. And Romney may come to regret his lack of effective outreach. Demography is a harsh, inexorable opponent. On the morning after Romneys victory celebration — if there is one — Republicans will wake with a Hispanic hangover.
An Obama win — with an assist by Ohio — would vindicate the presidents campaign game plan. But the Schoen Caddell prediction still holds: Obama will have left the nation divided, disillusioned and less governable.
Michael Gersons email address is michaelgerson@washpost.com.
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- In our opinion: A darkening cloud is hanging...
- Richard Davis: Airlines should do more for...
- Letters: Federal encroachment
- My view: People deserve rights at our borders
- Michael Gerson: Reinvigorating the GOP will...
- Letters: Ending debt
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons



Exactly where is Romney's positive campaign? Besides, Republicans stated goal was to make Obama a one term president and brought about a record number of filibusters. It was already hard to govern because Republicans are already a party of More..
Sad but true.
When I heard our President promise to get rid of the EPA and all government red tape to get help to the victims of Sandy, I laughed out loud. Why not do this all the time? Is Obama admitting that the government is the problem? Vote Romney, he gets More..