Others have termed this "reactionary liberalism." It is more the protection of accumulated interests than the application of creative reform to new problems. In the place of idealism, there is often anger. When Obama failed in his first debate, liberals were generally not critical that he lacked idealism. They were angry that he wasn't sufficiently angry. The fondest hopes and dreams of many on the left were apparently fulfilled in Joe Biden's sneer.
As a conservative, I can't endorse every policy of the Great Society — some were essential, others counterproductive. But America was better off because liberals called attention to those in the dawn, the twilight and the shadows of life. And American politics is worse off because liberalism has become a shadow of its former self.
Michael Gerson's email address is michaelgerson@washpost.com.



conservatism today...
the protection of accumulated assets transfered from the middle class...
arranged by sneering plutocrats.
Perfect.
@Mountanman;
Liberalism teaches people that they have a RIGHT to enjoy some of the rewards for the things THEY manufacture, not just the business owners.
Conservatism teaches people that ONLY the business owners have a right to More..
Today's liberalism is yesterday's moderate conservativism. Which means today's conservativism is what? Whatever you want to label it, it is extreme, certainly something Ronald Reagan could never have supported.