Saratoga Springs Mayor and Congressional candidate Mia Love smiles after giving her press conference Monday, Oct. 1, 2012, about the cost of having Congressman Jim Matheson in office.
Scott G Winterton, Scott G Winterton, Deseret News
Some pro-Matheson ads claim that Mia Love is against police officers and against body armor for them. No, she is against having the federal government pay for these things.
When the federal government pays, then our taxes rise and we go even deeper into debt. Love knows that if we keep more of our money locally, and pay for things as states and communities, then we get more bang for our buck and have a lot more control.
Jim Matheson, on the other hand, is a big-spending, big-government politician whose approach only perpetuates a monstrous, out-of-control federal government. Love's wise approach would reverse this destructive trend.
Gerald Larsen
Kearns
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will...
- My view: One woman's story of redemption...
- George F. Will: President Obama's new...
- Dan Liljenquist: Chaffetz's search for truth...
- Charles Krauthammer: Americans deserve the...
- Letter: Labeling all exotic animals as...
- In our opinion: Frances B. Monson's...
Subscribe
Mobile
RSS
The Matheson ads are accurate.
Headline reads: Mia Love has a wise approach to keep our money local’
Should read Mia Love has a naive idea that appeals to other simple minded folks!
PeanutGallery said: "The Matheson ads border on outright More..
Mia Love's underlying premise, like that of most conservatives, is that local government is more efficient, more competent, more responsive, less influenced by lobbyists and political donations, and less corrupt than the federal government, and More..