NEW YORK — The best way to reduce the federal deficit is through a combination of higher taxes and spending cuts, according to a group of economists.
The 236 members of the National Association for Business Economics recently surveyed say the country needs more fiscal stimulus through 2013, but by 2014 it should be time to throttle back. The reason for the delay: the sluggish nature of the country's economic recovery.
A majority of the economists favor extending payroll tax cuts, current marginal income tax rates and current tax rates for dividends and capital gains for most or all taxpayers through 2013. Deep tax cuts that were passed under President George W. Bush expire at the end of December unless Congress takes action. At the center of debate: extending the cuts for everybody or just households earning less than $250,000 a year.
When it comes to making those cuts permanent, the group is more split. Nearly three quarters think the payroll tax cut should not be made permanent. The group is almost evenly split about whether to make the tax cuts on income, dividends and capital gains permanent.
The biggest economic worry for the group was not how much to raise taxes or how to trim the budget. The problem cited was indecision: 87 percent of the economists believe that uncertainty about what direction Washington will take is holding back the economic recovery.
The survey on economic policies released Monday also forecast that short-term interest rates would remain at current levels for at least another year. The results are consistent with the last NABE semiannual survey, released in March.
A slight majority of respondents — 59 percent — said that current U.S. monetary policy was "about right." The percentage replying that monetary policy was "too stimulative" fell slightly compared with the percentage that held that same view in March, while the proportion answering that policy was "too restrictive" edged up.
The economists said the Federal Reserve should not buy more bonds to support and stimulate the economy, as it has in the last few years. The survey was conducted between Aug. 2 and Aug. 24, before the Federal Reserve announced a third round of bond buying on Sept. 13.
- S.L. draws up airport plans
- Should we let wunderkinds drop out of high...
- 'Mantiques' could be a ticket to more cash
- Taking back family dinner: A healthy,...
- AIG CEO tells college graduates facing...
- Did you just win $590M? Get a good team in place
- Tesoro to buy Chevron pipeline near Willard...
- XanGo seeks ouster of co-founder in new lawsuit
- Writers offer personal finance advice...
30 - S.L. draws up airport plans
29 - Should we let wunderkinds drop out of...
10 - Obama: 'Our focus cannot drift' from...
9 - Obama opposes GOP bill on Keystone XL...
6 - West Davis Corridor project unveiled...
6 - Airport TRAX ridership remains strong...
6 - Tea party tax returns show small...
5



Finally, some common sense and some truth about how to improve our very sick economy! Even Bill Clinton, with the help of a Republican congress understood this fact and the result was a surplus in the treasury! Today, one candidate wants to raise More..
Even I can see that, and I'm not even an economist.
So to the first two posters: Whose taxes should be raised? Or, what taxes should be raised?