The answer to this problem isn't to stop suppressing fires, as some environmentalists suggest. Even if we were willing to risk lives and property by taking the "let it burn" approach — and rational people are not — the fuel load today is so great that this would produce catastrophic fires, fires so intense that they would cook the soil and destroy whole ecosystems.
The answer is to reduce the fuel load through thinning of trees followed by forest management using prescribed burns, logging and other measures that could restore forests to their historic states.
This wouldn't just save and create jobs, as President Obama says he wants to do. It would also save and create healthy forests.
David A. Ridenour is president of the National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank.
- Jay Evensen: Obama's comedy appearance...
- A Hobson's choice: Religious freedom in the...
- My view: The 'resource curse' and rush for...
- Will November be a referendum on Obamacare?
- In our opinion: Unfinished legislative...
- My view: The sage grouse is worth protecting
- George F. Will: Squandered potential:...
- In our opinion: On matters of panhandling or...
- It doesn't have to be hard for... 60
- In our opinion: Obama's immigration... 52
- Letter: End daylight saving time 46
- Obama shows his funny side while... 40
- Libertarian wave wins big at CPAC 34
- Letter: Invite the divine 33
- Jay Evensen: Obama's comedy appearance... 31
- My view: SB54 will politically and... 30