I think I finally understand why Utah legislators refuse to properly fund public education. With the highest class counts in the nation, nearly lowest teacher pay, the state ranking now only 29th in the nation in dollars spent for public education per $1,000 in income, the state's students still score above the national average in pretty much every category.
It is almost as though our legislators are saying, "Why should we pay more? Look at what we are getting with what we are now spending."
But while I now understand their reasoning, I don't understand fully their motives. Not only are they making it difficult for public schools to attract and hold on to good teachers, at the same time they make it harder for those teachers who do come to Utah and stay with the system: more teacher evaluations, more testing of students, etc.
It is almost like they are punishing the teachers for their desire to live in Utah and for their work ethic that keeps our students above the national average.
Fred Ash
Sandy



Some people say that spending more money on education is unnecessary, and that we shouldn't just "throw money" at the problem. Maybe we should consult one of the best "cost benefit" men in the country for his opinion. The More..
Utah is shooting for mediocrity. Just enough to get by. A few bucks in the pocket today is more important than a big payoff from investing in the future.
and yet, here comes Mitt Romney for the 3rd time in the last few months sniffing for more money.
Imagine how many more teachers we could have hired, desks, field trips, and more materials we could have added to our education system with More..