Quantcast

Effect of jobs numbers on presidential race is uncertain

Published: Friday, Sept. 7 2012 3:36 p.m. MDT

June 2012, job seekers wait in line at a job fair expo in Anaheim, Calif. This August's job report seemed weak compared to July but might not sway decisions for the presidential race.

Jae C. Hong, Associated Press

Enlarge photo»

Our take: Though this month's anticipated jobs report was thought to help sway the presidential race, it ended up being more or less anticlimactic. Nate of the Five-thirty-eight blog reported on what the job numbers mean for the race:

"Friday's jobs report was a weak one — with August's job growth more in line with the tepid growth of the spring than the stronger numbers in July or over the winter months.

"Furthermore, job-growth numbers for May and June were revised downward slightly, and manufacturing jobs — a measure that Democrats touted at various points during their convention this week in Charlotte, N.C. — fell by 15,000.

"Politically, however, it is less certain that the report is going to matter that much. The unemployment rate declined for superficial reasons, which makes for a gentler headline for President Obama."

Read more about Effect of job numbers on The New York Times.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS