June 2012, job seekers wait in line at a job fair expo in Anaheim, Calif. This August's job report seemed weak compared to July but might not sway decisions for the presidential race.
Jae C. Hong, Associated Press
Our take: Though this month's anticipated jobs report was thought to help sway the presidential race, it ended up being more or less anticlimactic. Nate of the Five-thirty-eight blog reported on what the job numbers mean for the race:
"Friday's jobs report was a weak one — with August's job growth more in line with the tepid growth of the spring than the stronger numbers in July or over the winter months.
"Furthermore, job-growth numbers for May and June were revised downward slightly, and manufacturing jobs — a measure that Democrats touted at various points during their convention this week in Charlotte, N.C. — fell by 15,000.
"Politically, however, it is less certain that the report is going to matter that much. The unemployment rate declined for superficial reasons, which makes for a gentler headline for President Obama."
Read more about Effect of job numbers on The New York Times.
- Photo gallery: Tornado rips Oklahoma suburb
- Crews race to find survivors of Oklahoma...
- Journalists criticize Obama administration,...
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- Should we let wunderkinds drop out of high...
- Mile-wide tornado churns through Oklahoma...
- World War II munitions with mustard agent...
- Oklahoma, other tornado-hit states brace for...
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records,...
65 - Journalists criticize Obama...
32 - Associated Press CEO calls records...
23 - White House insists Obama was not...
22 - House chairman sees IRS targeting as...
16 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
15 - Republicans try to link IRS scandal,...
12 - Tea party looks to take advantage of...
12



The NYT tools for Obama: Of course they would downplay bad news.
Well I know Two people who will be in the unemployment line in a few weeks. And remember Hope can get you elected it can't get you re-elected.