Fact-checkers tackle Mitt Romney's RNC speech; fact-checker-checkers caution readers
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Abercrombie & Fitch CEO posts statement on...
- Teachers saved many lives during Oklahoma...
- Photo gallery: Tornado rips Oklahoma suburb
- Authorities: Man questioned in Boston bombing...
- Fire chief says search almost complete in...
- One block: How neighbors saw twister's deadly...
- IRS role in Obamacare adds deeper layer to...
Most Commented
Across Site
In World & Nation
- Mitt Romney talks IRS, AP records,...
65 - Journalists criticize Obama...
38 - Associated Press CEO calls records...
23 - White House insists Obama was not...
22 - Former IRS chief to Congress: Can't say...
20 - More Obama aides knew IRS targeted...
19 - IRS official Lerner invokes Fifth...
19 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
17



So, the premise is that the definition of "apology" is subjective, suggesting that the Fact checker sites may be biased, and then you cite 4 pages of Karl Rove's opinion as a rebuttal?
How about doing some real fact checking More..
Oh, so the standard bearer of truth is none other than one of the most crooked political hacks in the history of America --- Karl Rove?
Yeah.
Sheeeesh!
And, facts do have degrees of truth or require context to be fully understood.
Facts. Ronald Reagan lowered the top tax rate to 28%.
Today's tax rate is 35% for the top earners.
Reagan's tax rates are lower than More..