Stuart Johnson, Deseret News
In the Transfer of Public Lands Act, Utah is missing a vital point: Land within its borders belongs to Utah, not to the federal government.
An honest reading of the U.S. Constitution shows the federal government can only control two types of lands: Washington and military sites "purchased" from the states. Court rulings based upon the Property Clause utilize the words, "Territory or other Property belonging to the United States" which actually refer to U.S. land before that land became a state.
Think of it. It does not make sense for any of the 13 original states to have portions of their state be under federal control. States gave land to the federal government, not the other way around. But, don't expect the federal government to give up lands it has controlled for decades, especially when the Department of Interior is controlled by liberals, because their basic philosophy is for more and more centralized control. Look at all of the regulations and spending since 2006, especially in the Obama Administration.
- In our opinion: Legislators need to better...
- My view: The solution to Utah's water problems
- Dan Liljenquist: What we learned from the...
- My view: Is the Division of Water Resources...
- My view: Get insurance out of health care
- Last year's Utah Compromise is a model in...
- My view: hippies, 2 Hell's Angels, one...
- Richard Davis: Do presidents have to be...
- Richard Davis: Do presidents have to be... 55
- My view: Get insurance out of health care 47
- My view: Obama's veto won't save Obamacare 34
- In our opinion: Attempting to... 32
- My view: 'Death with dignity' and... 27
- In our opinion: Concerned voters a good... 23
- Trump and Sanders 22
- John Hoffmire: Electric cars and the... 20