Stuart Johnson, Deseret News
In the Transfer of Public Lands Act, Utah is missing a vital point: Land within its borders belongs to Utah, not to the federal government.
An honest reading of the U.S. Constitution shows the federal government can only control two types of lands: Washington and military sites "purchased" from the states. Court rulings based upon the Property Clause utilize the words, "Territory or other Property belonging to the United States" which actually refer to U.S. land before that land became a state.
Think of it. It does not make sense for any of the 13 original states to have portions of their state be under federal control. States gave land to the federal government, not the other way around. But, don't expect the federal government to give up lands it has controlled for decades, especially when the Department of Interior is controlled by liberals, because their basic philosophy is for more and more centralized control. Look at all of the regulations and spending since 2006, especially in the Obama Administration.
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington
- Disputes over specialized license plates...
- Jay Evensen: Cuba not likely to change...
- My view: Chaffetz named ‘politician of...
- In our opinion: Water, a precious commodity
- Lessons from 'Christmas Carol'
- Letter: Monolingual minorities
- Dan Liljenquist: Being good for goodness sake
- Charles Krauthammer: Democrats use... 78
- In our opinion: Police training should... 45
- Mike Lee: Change is coming to Washington 44
- Robert Bennett: More political... 36
- Susan Roylance: Definition of the... 34
- My view: Chaffetz named... 34
- Letter: Patriots or serfs? 33
- Jay Evensen: Cuba not likely to change... 30