Mike Terry, File, Deseret News
This election provides a clear choice between two very different visions of government. Are we truly "endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights," which government is formed to secure, "deriving its just powers from the consent of the governed?" Or are we merely appendages to the state, enjoying only such privileges as it agrees to grant, "resources" to be supervised, regulated and taxed in support of its ambitions?
Rep. Jim Matheson's 12-year voting record shows him to be solidly in the second camp. He only "puts Utah first" when his vote is not essential to promoting this government-centric agenda.
Michael A. Cosman
- In our opinion: Trouble on tap? Colleges...
- Drew Clark: Religious freedom is more than a...
- Robert Bennett: Obama has his own 'killer...
- In our opinion: Labor Day revisited
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How Utah...
- John Hoffmire: Monied interests and democracy
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 45
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Drew Clark: Religious freedom is more... 39
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to... 37
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- Letter: Society puzzles 33
- Join the discussion: Is Common Core... 32
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common... 31