I am a Utah native and a new mother to a baby girl, and I have been particularly struck by the excellent series of articles on Utah's air quality. It is incredibly important to me to offer my daughter the opportunity to grow up in the Salt Lake Valley near her family and with easy access to her heritage. That being said, it is equally important that she grow up free of unnecessary health burdens such as asthma and the other various respiratory illnesses that burden Utahns due to our ongoing poor air quality.
Unfortunately, it appears that these two imperatives of raising my daughter near family and growing up healthy are in direct contradiction with one another. With 65,000 children in Utah suffering from asthma, 2,000 people a year along the Wasatch Front dying prematurely and the average Utahn losing up to two years of their life to air pollution, how can the governor respond with only a voluntary program to reduce pollution levels? This is an irresponsible and careless position to take.
Protecting our health requires leadership and strong regulations, not volunteerism.
Katie Riggs Hansen
Salt Lake City
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- In our opinion: A darkening cloud is hanging...
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons
- Timothy R. Clark: Graduation advice for my...
- Letters: Threats justified
- My view: Nothing sinister about Common Core
- My view: People deserve rights at our borders
- Letters: Federal encroachment
- Letters: Stop the witch hunt 35
- John Florez: Show leadership on... 31
- Supreme Court, Congress, citizens: The... 27
- Letter: Media failure 25
- Letters: Threats justified 24
- Robert Bennett: Sticking to facts is... 23
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running... 19
- In our opinion: Limit the power of the... 18