John Lennon and his wife Yoko Ono raise their fists as they join a protest, Feb. 5, 1972, by about 500 persons in front of British Overseas Airways Corp. offices in New York on Fifth Avenue. The demonstrators called for the withdrawal of British troops from Northern Ireland. The image is featured in "The U.S. vs. John Lennon." (AP Photo/Ron Frehm)
Associated Press
I was surprised, puzzled and even a bit shocked to see the London Symphony Orchestra and the Liverpool Philharmonic Youth Choir showcase John Lennon's atheist anthem "Imagine" during the closing ceremonies of the 2012 Summer Olympic Games.
And that white death-masklike portrait of Lennon in the center of Olympic Stadium? Pretty ghastly — and especially so when it dissolved (decomposed?) at the end of the song. But that's a separate issue.
Don't get me wrong: Sadly, while I attended many California rock concerts featuring such Lennon contemporaries as the Byrds, Iron Butterfly, B.B. King, Cream and the Rolling Stones, I never saw the Beatles in a live performance. But I've been a wildly enthusiastic fan almost all of my life, and John Lennon was far and away my favorite of the four. (Living in Cairo, Egypt, when the shocking news of his death arrived, I felt as if Mark David Chapman had also murdered my youth.)
Still, "Imagine" is a silly song, and, surely, to at least a substantial proportion of those who watched and participated in the Olympics, it's a potentially offensive one. Consider these lyrics:
Imagine there's no heaven.
It's easy if you try.
No hell below us,
Above us only sky.
Imagine all the people
Living for today.
Imagine there's no countries.
It isn't hard to do.
Nothing to kill or die for,
And no religion, too.
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace …
You may say I'm a dreamer.
But I'm not the only one.
I hope someday you'll join us,
And the world will be as one.
First of all, Lennon's projected utopia seems … well, rather dull. Nothing worth dying for? No great loyalties, passions or affections?
Living only "for today"? No long-term goals? No aspirations or ambitions? No dreams? No great achievements against the odds? That, I suspect, would pall pretty quickly.
The Olympic athletes in that stadium certainly didn't get there by just wandering aimlessly into the Games. They reached it through long, disciplined, goal-oriented effort. So did the musicians who performed, the cameramen who filmed the ceremony and the technicians who oversaw its broadcast. The stadium itself certainly wasn't conceived and built by people merely "living for today."
Much more importantly, though, there exists little if any evidence to demonstrate that, were religion only to disappear, we'd all live in peace, love and brotherhood. Consider, for example, the historical record of such officially atheistic regimes as Stalin's Russia, Mao's China, Pol Pot's Cambodia and Castro's Cuba, or, for that matter, of Citizen Robespierre's revolutionary France. Their victims total many scores of millions. And while Nazi Germany represents a more complex (and perhaps altogether incoherent) case, Hitler's dismissal of humankind as "a ridiculous cosmic bacterium" doesn't exactly sound like orthodox Christianity or even theism.
- Sister Frances J. Monson's legacy of love...
- LDS Church responds to Boy Scouts of...
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- Live streaming: Frances J. Monson funeral
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- 'Hollywood goes to Mormon country': BYU...
- USA Today takes note of LDS sister missionaries
- Boy Scouts of America to make membership...
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
44 - 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
40 - Secretary of State John Kerry says...
26 - Muslim leaders in U.S. facing...
25 - LDS Church responds to Boy Scouts of...
25 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Wright Words: Oklahoma tornado provides...
23 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
17



I for one, love the song. As an American citizen married to a Russian citizen, imaginging "there's no countries" is something that resonates very deeply with me. And while as a member of the church, I disagree with the sentiment about More..
I believe Mr. Peterson reads far too much into the lyrics, and errs when calling Imagine an "atheist anthem".
I agree with elarue that it was an idealistic expression in a turbulent time, wishing for the absence of injustice More..
I can (ahem) "imagine" that John Lennon was not unlike millions of others who look around and see much of what is posed to them as "religion" as repressive to many, distasteful, and extremely hypocritical. I happen to have found a More..