Familiar foe: In Ryan, Obama sees twofold target

By Ken Thomas

Associated Press

Published: Tuesday, Aug. 14 2012 1:11 a.m. MDT

FILE - In this April 13, 2011 file photo, Republican Vice Presidential candidate, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., takes questions in reaction to President Obama's speech on a federal spending plan, during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington. Obama has found himself at constant odds with Ryan and other House Republicans

J. Scott Applewhite, File, Associated Press

DES MOINES, Iowa — In his run for a second term, President Barack Obama had an opponent before he had an opponent: House Republicans. They shellacked him in the midterm elections, blocked much of his legislative agenda and pushed economic views that are wildly different from his.

Mitt Romney put a campaign face on all that for Obama: Paul Ryan.

Now Obama is attacking both the "do-nothing Congress" and Romney at once, two forces united as a target on the Republican presidential ticket. Going after votes in Iowa on Monday, Obama called Ryan the "ideological leader" of House Republicans and singled him out as "one of the leaders of Congress standing in the way" of a bill to help farmers in a time of disastrous drought.

"I've gotten to know Congressman Ryan. He's a good man. He's a family man. He's a very articulate spokesperson for Governor Romney's vision," Obama said in Boone on the first of a three-day bus tour through Iowa. "The problem is it's the wrong vision for America. It's a vision that I fundamentally disagree with."

Obama also has something with Ryan that he does not with the presumptive Republican nominee — a relationship of sorts. Obama has laughed with Ryan, sparred with him and attacked his ideas right in front of him. Even their favorite football teams, Obama's Chicago Bears and Ryan's Green Bay Packers, are rivals.

"I know him," Obama told supporters over the weekend. "I welcome him to the race."

He meant that politically, not just politely, as both sides adjust to what Ryan means at Romney's side.

Romney is benefiting from the energy, campaign buzz and ideas that come with Ryan, the 42-year-old rising political star from Wisconsin. Yet Romney also aligned himself with Congress, whose public approval of its performance was a lowly 22 percent in an AP-GfK poll earlier this summer, compared with nearly 50 percent for Obama.

Ryan is chairman of the House Budget Committee. His name is ideologically synonymous in Washington with controversial plans for cutting spending.

Long before Romney announced Ryan as his running mate Saturday, Obama himself sought to link the two men. The president sees Ryan as the budgetary voice of a "prescription for decline" in America in which government policies help the rich at the expense of everyone else.

When Obama started going after Romney more directly in the spring, he specifically cited Romney's support for Ryan's budget-slashing blueprint, one that would overhaul Medicare and cut taxes and the deficit. Obama called it "thinly veiled social Darwinism" that would gut opportunity and upward mobility.

At least Ryan was not in the audience that time.

In a blistering speech in April 2011, Obama unveiled a plan for cutting the nation's debt in the long term, seen as a counterpunch to a plan from Ryan. Referring to the Ryan plan, Obama said it would "end Medicare as we know it," a message his campaign will now blast every day.

Ryan said at the time he was excited to get invited to the speech at George Washington University. That changed when he heard Obama speak. "What we got was a speech that was excessively partisan, dramatically inaccurate and hopelessly inadequate to addressing our country's pressing fiscal challenges," he said.

To audiences, Obama and Ryan can both operate in a big-message world, but they are both comfortable in the weeds of policies. Even with each other.

When Obama spoke to House Republicans at their own conference in January 2010, he commended Ryan for having put forward "a serious proposal." Obama made clear it had ideas he agreed with and plenty of others "we should have a healthy debate about because I don't agree with them."

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS