Tom Smart, Deseret News
Lately, I have heard ads on the radio sponsored by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. Its tact is to suggest that if the state of Utah takes over large tracts of land, it will be bad for Utah taxpayers.
My thought is since when has SUWA cared even a little bit about Utah taxpayers? Over the years, SUWA has pretty much only shown condescending contempt for people who actually live and work in this state.
It would be much more honest for it to say that it is worried about the state taking over management of some of the land because SUWA and other similar organizations are more successful influencing the federal government than the state government, and the state might decide to use the land in ways other than what SUWA would like.
D. Craig Conder
- Ralph Hancock: Society cannot 'progress'...
- My view: Medicaid will sting Beehive State's...
- Letter: Moral decline
- Letter: My sons
- John Hoffmire: Unknowingly raising another...
- Brian S. Brown: In defending marriage, Utah...
- Jay Evensen: U2's 'free' album highlights...
- Who likes Obama's ISIS plan, and who doesn't
- Letter: Moral decline 87
- Ralph Hancock: Society cannot... 65
- Brian S. Brown: In defending marriage,... 55
- In our opinion: Some universities... 45
- Politico Magazine: If Mitt Romney runs... 44
- Robert Bennett: Obama should not move... 40
- My view: Government broadband spells... 28
- In our opinion: Revisiting racial... 25