J. Scott Applewhite, File, Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO — Backers of California's ban on same-sex marriages asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday to overrule a federal appeals court that struck down the measure as unconstitutional, a move that means the bitter, four-year court fight over Proposition 8 could soon be resolved.
Lawyers for the coalition of religious conservative groups that sponsored the voter-approved ban petitioned the Supreme Court to review the lower court's finding that the 2008 amendment to the state constitution violated the civil rights of gay and lesbian Californians. The request had been expected since a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its 2-1 decision earlier this year.
If the high court declines to take the case, it would clear the way for same-sex marriages to resume in California.
Gay couples were able to get married in the state for several months before Proposition 8 passed, an option the measure was designed to take away. Same-sex couples still have the rights and benefits of marriage controlled by state law if they register as domestic partners.
The divided appeals court panel cited those conditions, which were unique to California at the time, as grounds for striking down the ban as a violation of the U.S. Constitution's promise of equal protection. But it also went out of its way to state it was not saying similar bans in six other states it oversees were inherently unconstitutional.
In their petition to the Supreme Court, lawyers for Proposition 8's supporters nonetheless predicted "the 9th Circuit's error, if left uncorrected, will have widespread and immediate negative consequences."
The decision "will force states to make an all-or-nothing choice: either to retain the traditional definition of marriage without any recognition of same-sex relationships or to radically redefine with no possibility of reconsideration an age-old institution that continues to play a vital role in our society today," they said. "The 9th Circuit's sweeping dismissal of the important societal interests served by the traditional definition of marriage is tantamount to a judicial death sentence for traditional marriage laws throughout the Circuit."
Lawyers for two same-sex couples who first challenged Proposition 8 in 2009 said they would urge the Supreme Court to reject the case. The high court is expected to act on the petition this fall.
Justices also have been asked by the Obama administration to review a series of challenges to the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex unions and thereby prevents gay couples who are legally married from filing joint income tax returns, receiving Social Security survivor benefits and securing other national benefits involving marriage.
Four federal trial judges have ruled that the 1996 act violates the equal protection rights of married gay couples. The most recent ruling came Tuesday in a case brought by six couples and a widower from Connecticut, New Hampshire and Vermont.
The Supreme Court could decide to postpone dealing with Proposition 8 until it takes up the challenges to the federal law, or decide to wrap the California ban in with those cases as part of a comprehensive review of same-sex marriage.
- Little difference between PG-13 and R-rated...
- Many Mormon missionaries who return home...
- Calliop, Jag and Tintin: Here's a look at 20...
- Better than a raise: The smallest thing you...
- WestJet airline video goes viral as Santa...
- What you think of welfare program depends on...
- Adjunct professors unionize for respect and...
- Walmart, Kmart 'Layaway Angels' spreading...
- Can Mandela's legacy revive the GOP? 32
- Health care debate about presidential... 24
- Health care signups increase to... 22
- India government likely to review... 21
- What you think of welfare program... 20
- Looking beyond the premium is a... 16
- Little difference between PG-13 and... 12
- The American Dream is still alive for... 11