Since the Supreme Court ruling on the Citizens United case allowed for limitless spending of money in elections, it has become paramount that the public at least know where the recent, huge influx of money is coming from. This information is vital for the public to make informed decisions on the veracity of political ads.
The Disclose Act would require companies or individuals to report donations of more than $10,000 for political purposes; individuals and companies would be accountable for the ads their money buy. If the ad is publicly broadcast, the money source should be as well. It's a basic principle of honesty: If you criticize someone in public, stand by your belief instead of hiding behind a secret political ad.
Sadly, Sen. Orrin Hatch disagrees. He thinks that limitless amounts of money should be able to be spent in secret; he does not even want the Disclose Act to be voted on. Recently, he and fellow republicans filibustered allowing the Disclose Act to move to the Senate floor for an open and fair vote. Honesty and transparency should be cornerstones in politics, but apparently they are not.
Salt Lake City
- Jay Evensen: Is Provo really an impoverished...
- Everything you need to know about the...
- In our opinion: Avoid blurring the line...
- Letter: Protected lands
- My view: Holistic approach to wild horses...
- Richard Davis: Legislators— Model the...
- Join the discussion: Why is young adult...
- Letter: Utah's birthright
- Robert Bennett: Contrary to Krugman,... 60
- Letter: Learn the Constitution 52
- In our opinion: Explaining editorial... 44
- Letter: Utah's birthright 44
- Join the discussion: Why is young adult... 39
- In our opinion: Avoid blurring the line... 39
- Michael Gerson: Rand Paul's bogus outreach 34
- John Florez: Corporate or public... 31