Since the Supreme Court ruling on the Citizens United case allowed for limitless spending of money in elections, it has become paramount that the public at least know where the recent, huge influx of money is coming from. This information is vital for the public to make informed decisions on the veracity of political ads.
The Disclose Act would require companies or individuals to report donations of more than $10,000 for political purposes; individuals and companies would be accountable for the ads their money buy. If the ad is publicly broadcast, the money source should be as well. It's a basic principle of honesty: If you criticize someone in public, stand by your belief instead of hiding behind a secret political ad.
Sadly, Sen. Orrin Hatch disagrees. He thinks that limitless amounts of money should be able to be spent in secret; he does not even want the Disclose Act to be voted on. Recently, he and fellow republicans filibustered allowing the Disclose Act to move to the Senate floor for an open and fair vote. Honesty and transparency should be cornerstones in politics, but apparently they are not.
Salt Lake City
- Top scandals and controversies of each United...
- In our opinion: Scouting success will come...
- Top scandals and controversies of each US...
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus vote
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate
- Lois M. Collins: Kids' summer 'bucket list'...
- Letters: No welfare, ever 60
- Letters: Deception and government 31
- Letter: The real death panel:... 30
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation... 25
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus... 25
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate 25
- Letters: Paycheck Fairness Act 21
- Matthew Sanders: Imploding trust in... 20