The timing of the Bain outsourcing is important, as well as the fact that it happened. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, there was an honest labor shortage in the U.S., and many firms began to outsource because there were not qualified, potential recruits in the U.S. This is what was going on at Bain and several other firms from 1999 to 2002.
The problem is that when the dot-com bubble burst, too many firms kept outsourcing because labor from overseas companies was, and still is, a bargain. The real question that should be asked is: How did America lose it's competitive advantage and what can we do now to fix it? Using this as a game of political "gotcha" isn't really helping anyone.
Ben Hunt
New Haven
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- Timothy R. Clark: Graduation advice for my...
- Letters: Threats justified
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons
- My view: Nothing sinister about Common Core
- State pensions threaten to bleed states dry
- In our opinion: New leader in Iran, but...
- In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letters: Stop the witch hunt
35 - John Florez: Show leadership on...
31 - Supreme Court, Congress, citizens: The...
27 - Letter: Media failure
25 - Robert Bennett: Sticking to facts is...
23 - Letters: Threats justified
23 - In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
18 - Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running...
17




U.S. corporations sent their jobs to India, Mexico and China because labor costs in those countries are dirt-cheap and there are no health-safety protections for workers. Period. The notion that there was ever a "labor shortage" in the US More..
This letter is political rationalization, for sure. And the Bain outsourcing extended well beyond the period you state. Your argument is duplicitous political rhetoric.
Given the unemployment situation, and the quality of people who are looking for jobs, I hardly think that a "workforce shortage" exists.