I got a good chuckle from Alan Carabine's letter describing Republicans as "realists" ("Health care is not a 'right' — it is a responsibility," July 1).
Was he describing our local ones who don't believe in ethics reform, who gave away $13 million to silence a private contractor and who deny the negative consequences of lowest per-pupil spending in the nation?
Or the ones in D.C. who believe that the president was born in Kenya, that trickle-down economics works (while the rich are fattening their wallets, the middle-class disappears and our economy continues to stagnate), that the war in Iraq would pay for itself and that thought it wise to downgrade our credit rating?
Realist wasn't the description I was thinking. In fact, in today's political climate, neither party should be described as "realist." However, the Affordable Care Act is a step in the right direction and President Obama couldn't have done it without the idea of the individual mandate created by the Heritage Foundation, an idea endorsed by Sen. Orrin Hatch in the mid-90s, and without moderate Mitt Romney providing the model used now by the Federal Government.
Dane Henderson
Orem
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation of...
- Dan Liljenquist: Chaffetz's search for truth...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How will...
- In our opinion: Frances B. Monson's...
- My view: One woman's story of redemption...
- Letter: The real death panel: Republican...
- George F. Will: President Obama's new...
- Charles Krauthammer: Americans deserve the...



Good letter, Dane.
Actually, Republicans and conservatives are more paranoid than realists. Fertile imaginations are susceptible to sheer fantasy.
Where was Haha and Mikey Richards when Orrin Hatch and the rest of the repubs supported "Obamacare" in the 90s? The individual mandate was a great idea then. It was constitutional then. Why is it all of a sudden unconstitutional now?
Hey, Mikey...
Have you not heard of Citizens United or the Kelo v New London???