Last week, the Supreme Court reiterated the constitutional responsibility of the federal government concerning immigration. In so doing, Justice Kennedy explained, "with power comes responsibility …" It is unfortunate that Kennedy states that responsibility occurs as a consequence of increased power. The proper exercise of power occurs only in service to the responsibility for which that power was intended. Ironically, Justice Roberts demonstrated this principle in issuing the Supreme Court's decision on health care. Because the Supreme Court is not responsible for taxes, they likewise have no power to do anything about this "tax."
Our government rests on the principle of the balance of powers. The key responsibilities of making, enforcing and administering our laws are divided amongst different offices. The powers afforded those offices are subservient to the responsibilities assumed by their respective roles. Indeed, the issue addressed in the Arizona immigration law was a question of one office co-opting the responsibilities and exercising the powers of another office.
The Supreme Court justices have done their part and their power can extend no further than the decision they have issued. Now it's high time that Congress exercise its power to fulfill its responsibilities. Else, what good is their power?
- Jay Evensen: Ask people in the Third World if...
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal benefits of...
- My view: Medical marijuana: Google vs. PubMed
- George F. Will: Break the dentists' hold on...
- Rely on invisible hand?
- My view: Why so many Americans find Trump and...
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe?
- My view: Does going to pot send the wrong...
- In our opinion: National security and... 79
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 58
- My view: Scouting: Friend or foe? 39
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps... 34
- Jay Evensen: Legislature's pornography... 32
- In our opinion: Alleged medicinal... 32
- Letter: Coal and job creation 24
- Rely on invisible hand? 24