Last week, the Supreme Court reiterated the constitutional responsibility of the federal government concerning immigration. In so doing, Justice Kennedy explained, "with power comes responsibility …" It is unfortunate that Kennedy states that responsibility occurs as a consequence of increased power. The proper exercise of power occurs only in service to the responsibility for which that power was intended. Ironically, Justice Roberts demonstrated this principle in issuing the Supreme Court's decision on health care. Because the Supreme Court is not responsible for taxes, they likewise have no power to do anything about this "tax."
Our government rests on the principle of the balance of powers. The key responsibilities of making, enforcing and administering our laws are divided amongst different offices. The powers afforded those offices are subservient to the responsibilities assumed by their respective roles. Indeed, the issue addressed in the Arizona immigration law was a question of one office co-opting the responsibilities and exercising the powers of another office.
The Supreme Court justices have done their part and their power can extend no further than the decision they have issued. Now it's high time that Congress exercise its power to fulfill its responsibilities. Else, what good is their power?
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious...
- The complicated political views of...
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have voted for
- In our opinion: Airport expansion reflects...
- In our opinion: Use market forces and not...
- In our opinion: History will remember our...
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and the...
- Letter: Breeding hate
- In our opinion: U.S. Supreme Court... 104
- Mary Barker: The Romney I may have... 63
- My view: Amnesty towards border... 56
- Stuart Reid: Translations of religious... 53
- In our opinion: History will remember... 46
- Letter: Society values 45
- Dan Liljenquist: Religious liberty and... 43
- Letter: Breeding hate 40