Episcopal Church leaders set to consider blessing rite for same-sex couples
PHILADELPHIA — Sixteen fractious years after it allowed the ordination of homosexuals, the Episcopal Church appears poised to adopt a blessing rite for same-sex couples wishing to wed.
If approved, as expected, at the church's General Convention starting Thursday in Indianapolis, the liturgy would be the first such rite endorsed by a major denomination in the United States.
Advocates of the blessing — already written, down to the "We have gathered here today" and "I do" and the exchange of rings — stress that it is not a sacrament and would not confer "marriage" on the couple.
Episcopal Church law defines marriage as the union of man and woman, and there are no plans to change that this year.
But the 2009 convention had encouraged bishops in states allowing same-sex marriage — currently six, and the District of Columbia — to "provide generous pastoral response" to gay and lesbian members. It also authorized creation of the rite now under consideration.
Its passage would be a major advance for gay people within the 2 million-member denomination, says Bishop Charles E. Bennison Jr. of the Diocese of Pennsylvania.
He serves on the legislative committee that will present the measure to the 300-member House of Bishops and the 800 laity and clergy who make up the House of Deputies. If the same-sex blessing is to pass, both houses must approve it.
"For some people, it's going to be troubling. For others, it's going to be thrilling," said Bennison, whose 55,000-member diocese encompasses Philadelphia and the four suburban counties.
The measure seems to have broad support in the House of Deputies, he said. But some moderate bishops, he added, fear it could divide their dioceses. A hearing on the blessing is set for Saturday evening, but a vote is not yet scheduled.
Despite growing public acceptance of gay rights, homosexuality remains a contentious topic for mainline Protestant churches. In May, the General Conference of the United Methodist Church soundly rejected a measure declaring homosexuality "incompatible with Christian teaching," but did not vote on proposals allowing openly gay clergy or same-sex blessings.
On Monday, a committee of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) debated proposals to change its definition of marriage from "the union of a man and a woman" to "the union of two people," and permit clergy to perform same-gender marriage in states where it is legal.
Even if the Assembly, convened in Pittsburgh, adopts the measures, a majority of the church's 173 regional bodies, or presbyteries, would also have to approve before they become church law.
The proposed Episcopalian rite is similar to the wedding liturgy that its opposite-sex couples use, said the Rev. Ruth Meyers, chairwoman of the church's Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music that devised it.
"But the (same-sex) couple's commitment to one another as being rooted in their commitment to God is more explicitly stated" than in the traditional wedding rite in the church's Book of Common Prayer.
A professor of liturgics at the Episcopal seminary in Berkeley, Calif., Meyers said her commission studied hundreds of home-made and unauthorized blessing rites, some dating to the 1970s, after it issued a public call for them three years ago.
Titled "The Witnessing and Blessing of a Lifelong Covenant," the proposed liturgy also allows for an exchange and blessing of rings that have already been exchanged. "We're aware," Meyers said, "that some people in committed relationships might have given each other rings 20 years ago."
In 2009, the General Convention, which meets triennially, also authorized her commission to develop a theological and cultural basis for blessing same-sex unions.
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- Live streaming: Frances J. Monson funeral
- 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
- USA Today takes note of LDS sister missionaries
- Defending the Faith: A case for the...
- Sister Frances J. Monson's legacy of love...
- Tornado relief spurs LDS Church, Layton's...
- Public invited to funeral services for Sister...
- 'Tattooed Mormon' Al Fox shares her...
39 - Defending the Faith: A case for the...
27 - Muslim leaders in U.S. facing...
25 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Wright Words: Oklahoma tornado provides...
23 - Secretary of State John Kerry says...
22 - Supreme Court to weigh in on...
17 - Letters to family show Steven Powell...
14




What mankind thinks the Lord met and what He really means could be two different things.
Mankind is rewriting scripture to fit social change and by-pass sin.
@linus
Since only people can receive "revelations" how do we know that their "revelations" are anything more then the influence of those around them to make certain decisions. Do you have any objective, physical evidence that More..
I was surprised to read this endorsement of "continuing revelation." Too bad he didn't identify the source of that revelation. He does go on to say that the congregants have the right to decide what the scriptures mean. Perhaps it More..