Baby Boom generation faces difficult demographic changes
WASHINGTON — Long associated in the popular mind with social and political change, the baby boomers are about to confront the biggest change in the American fabric in their lifetimes: our country's new demographics.
And they're not ready.
Recent U.S. Census numbers show that white babies are, for the first time, a minority of all births, putting an exclamation point on a trend that has been building for decades. A glance around schoolyards and community centers shows that children are becoming more racially and ethnically diverse than ever.
It is this diverse youth population that the largely white baby boomers will rely on in their retirement years to keep paying into Social Security and Medicare.
Yet a Pew Research Center survey published in November showed only 23 percent of baby boomers regard the country's growing population of immigrants as a change for the better. Some 43 percent saw it as a change for the worse. Almost half of white boomers said the growing number of newcomers from other countries represented a threat to traditional U.S. customs and values.
Older whites in general tend to be less favorable to more government programs, except Social Security and Medicare, a significant change from their views in the late 1980s. Nowadays, younger minorities hold the views that boomers used to have -- supporting government programs they see as important for their upward mobility.
What's emerging is a cultural gap between the largest generation and the youngest.
That divide is created by the size and cultural dominance of the 78 million-member baby boom generation. A generation that once expressed distrust for anyone older than 30 is now itself isolated from a younger, far more diverse America.
Boomers were born to parents whose upward mobility was aided by such sweeping public programs as the G.I. Bill. They benefited from a wide array of programs supporting higher education and became a highly educated generation. Still, this generation seems to be having trouble letting go, showing more than a little antipathy toward today's diverse, younger Americans.
Why is this happening? Part of the reason is that boomers grew up in an era when immigration was at its nadir. From 1946 to 1964, the share of immigrants was at the lowest level in the 20th century, and most of the immigrants were white Europeans. So boomers had minimal involvement with people from other countries. Today, immigrants comprise 13 percent of our population, and they are far more diverse.
That created an isolation that persists. Among Americans older than 50, 76 percent are white, and the black population, at 10 percent, is the largest minority. Among those younger than 30, 55 percent are whites. Hispanics, Asians and other nonblack minorities account for 31 percent of that age group. Younger people are much more likely to be first- and second-generation Americans of non-European ancestry and able to speak other languages besides English.
Yet, no matter the disconnect, the youngest and the oldest generations are inextricably linked.
The 2010 Census told us we would have faced an absolute decade-long decline in our under-18 population, had it not been for the gain of 5.5 million Hispanic and Asian youths. Between now and 2030, there will be an absolute decline of 10 million (mostly baby boom) whites from the ranks of our working-age population.
Those ranks can be replenished only by the growing minority youth population. Much of this growth will occur because of births, regardless of immigration trends.
The contributions these people make will depend heavily on the opportunities they receive, particularly through education. Barriers are especially challenging for many minority children with talent and high aspirations, who continue to attend segregated, underfunded school systems. Currently, high-school dropout rates for Hispanics are more than twice as high as those of non-Hispanic whites. More than a third of Hispanic and black children live in poverty.
Advancement of our young people into middle-class jobs at all skill levels is essential to future economic growth. That growth is, in turn, essential to our country's ability to provide opportunities and social supports. Absent these investments, we are looking at a society whose members will be fighting over pieces of a shrinking pie.
Because of their numbers and clout, the voices of baby boomers will be heard. Let's hope that they, in turn, hear the message that their future, as well as the nation's future, is tied to the well being of today's diverse, striving younger Americans.
William H. Frey is a demographer at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
- What The New York Times gets wrong about...
- In our opinion: It's time for Utah to adopt a...
- My view: Now is the time for significant...
- Michael and Jenet Erickson: Utah businesses...
- Jay Evensen: Will Obama visit Utah? Do we care?
- Dan Liljenquist: Predictions for the 2015...
- W. Bradford Wilcox: Yes, women and children...
- In our opinion: Fairness for all in religious...
- What The New York Times gets wrong... 54
- Michael and Jenet Erickson: Utah... 49
- In our opinion: It's time to end the... 42
- Mike Lee: Tax reform shouldn't penalize... 38
- In our opinion: Fairness for all in... 37
- Jay Evensen: Will Obama visit Utah? Do... 37
- In our opinion: Disney outbreak sends a... 33
- Robert Bennett: Obama's State of the... 31