David Brooks: Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts: Modesty and Audacity
Our take: Justice Roberts' move to side with those affirming the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, took many Republicans by surprise. In this article, David Brooks seeks to explain a different take on Roberts' actions and how his modest opinion holds to conservative values of restricting the size of national government.
Washington is full of arrogant people who grab power whenever they get the chance. But there is at least one modest minimalist in town, and thats John Roberts Jr.
In his remarkable health care opinion Thursday, the chief justice of the United States restrained the power of his own institution. He decided not to use judicial power to overrule the democratic process. He decided not to provoke a potential institutional crisis. Granted, he had to imagine a law slightly different than the one that was passed in order to get the result he wanted, but Robertss decision still represents a moment of, if I can say so, Burkean minimalism and self-control.
- Which states are best for tax payers?
- In our opinion: Western land standoff aside,...
- Jay Evensen: No more rent for inmates —...
- Doug Robinson: Horrific crimes show the thin...
- Letter: Right and wrong
- My view: Utah's agriculture industry needs...
- Kathleen Parker: Putin knows in geopolitical...
- Letter: Plenty of danger in e-cigarettes
- Letter: Right and wrong 93
- My view: Anti-science ruins the climate... 67
- Robert Bennett: Immigration reform... 64
- Letter: Science consensus is slow,... 49
- In our opinion: Confronted by power,... 40
- In our opinion: Western land standoff... 35
- Letter: Republican empathy too rare 28
- John Hoffmire: Why shouldn’t... 28