I appreciate the letter expressing concern for the Colorado River, I really do ("Save the Colorado River," Reader's Forum, June 2). It's truly beautiful. It cut out the Grand Canyon. Awesome. It runs through countless miles of otherwise barren wasteland. Super. But I wonder about the "tremendous threat" called the Glen Canyon dam. The 1.2 million acres of fresh water and 1,021.248 megawatts generated capacity kind of threat. Such a hazard apparently needs to go. Why? Evaporation, seepage, sediment and energy experts.
OK then, let's beautify the desert by creating the biggest bathtub-ring canyon in the world. Let's let the river flow more freely into the massive fountains and swimming pools of frosty Las Vegas so that water doesn't evaporate. All this to make sure that the silt and sediment can get to Mexico easier. And, it's a good thing no one enjoys outdoor recreation in the West, otherwise we'd have trouble pulling the plug.
And do we drain Lake Mead too? More water seepage and sediment deposits there.
Now seriously, are we really too busy upstream to notice the beauty and utility of these lakes themselves?
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- Perceptions of Obama and his policies at home...
- Capitalism and the common good: Fairness,...
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'?
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 114
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 47
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 38
- Capitalism and the common good:... 37
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 36