I appreciate the letter expressing concern for the Colorado River, I really do ("Save the Colorado River," Reader's Forum, June 2). It's truly beautiful. It cut out the Grand Canyon. Awesome. It runs through countless miles of otherwise barren wasteland. Super. But I wonder about the "tremendous threat" called the Glen Canyon dam. The 1.2 million acres of fresh water and 1,021.248 megawatts generated capacity kind of threat. Such a hazard apparently needs to go. Why? Evaporation, seepage, sediment and energy experts.
OK then, let's beautify the desert by creating the biggest bathtub-ring canyon in the world. Let's let the river flow more freely into the massive fountains and swimming pools of frosty Las Vegas so that water doesn't evaporate. All this to make sure that the silt and sediment can get to Mexico easier. And, it's a good thing no one enjoys outdoor recreation in the West, otherwise we'd have trouble pulling the plug.
And do we drain Lake Mead too? More water seepage and sediment deposits there.
Now seriously, are we really too busy upstream to notice the beauty and utility of these lakes themselves?
- 10 movies that offended foreign governments
- In our opinion: U.S. Supreme Court delivers...
- Robert Bennett: Shurtleff and Swallow are...
- In our opinion: It's time to scrutinize...
- About Utah: Q&A with former Kearns,...
- Richard Davis: Latter-day Saints should...
- My view: Amnesty towards border children is...
- Letter: Gun control
- Richard Davis: Latter-day Saints should... 190
- My view: Marriage and social justice go... 98
- Greg Bell: Defenders of religious... 86
- In our opinion: Religious freedom... 55
- In our opinion: It's time to scrutinize... 55
- Letter: Gun control 50
- Letter: Obama fans? 44
- In our opinion: U.S. Supreme Court... 40