Laura Seitz, Deseret News
Dan Liljenquist's TV ad, which he can run only infrequently and without opportunity for debate, is correct in reviewing the record for which Sen. Orrin Hatch is accountable. It includes favoring perks and immunity for elected officials, sponsorship of far too many earmarks for special interests, collaborative participation in a Senate that has created programs of political purpose over national need and failure of "his" Senate Finance Committee in oversight and control of spending by federal agencies.
Indiana moved a step in the future by removing Hatch's long term colleague, who like Hatch is a fine person who served excessive terms with best intentions, but whose time has passed. Utah now has the opportunity to extend the process in the election of a new senator with a new perspective.
Salt Lake City
- Everything you need to know about the...
- Join the discussion: Why is young adult...
- In our opinion: Avoid blurring the line...
- My view: Utah's public education system:...
- Letter: Utah's birthright
- Michael Gerson: Rand Paul's bogus outreach
- Jay Evensen: Is Provo really an impoverished...
- Socratic observations — Politics are...
- Robert Bennett: Contrary to Krugman,... 56
- Letter: Learn the Constitution 52
- In our opinion: Explaining editorial... 44
- Letter: Utah's birthright 43
- Join the discussion: Why is young adult... 32
- John Florez: Corporate or public... 31
- Michael Gerson: Rand Paul's bogus outreach 30
- Letter: Whole story 28