Bebeto Matthews, File, Associated Press
Is it just me, or does anyone else see the irony in Sen. Mike Lee's short sale bail out? In 2008, JPMorgan gets a $25 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, bailout because of, among other things, the decision to invest in risky mortgages. In 2010, candidate Lee attacks Sen. Bob Bennett mercilessly because he compromised his Republican principles and voted for the bank portion of TARP. Now in 2012 Lee finds financial and moral compromise quite to his liking by accepting a bailout from none other than TARP bank JPMorgan.
Why does Lee insist that the taxpayer bailout of JPMorgan was bad yet take his own personal bailout from JPMorgan? How many more Lee bailouts does JPMorgan have to give before the taxpayers need to bail it out again? Or, dare we say it's because of the TARP bailout that JPMorgan is now in the position to bail Lee out? Is Lee just too big to fail? He needs to send a letter of thanks to Bennett for his TARP vote. Better yet, a note of apology. Truly, you can't make this stuff up.
- In our opinion: Brexit and the U.K.'s new...
- On Second Thought: Departugal, Italeave and...
- John Florez: If elephants can dance so can...
- Letter: Come together
- Letter: Reducing teacher load
- Charles Krauthammer: Hillaryism: Tired...
- Robert J. Samuelson: Are you a 'work martyr'?
- Ralph Becker: The path to healthy communities...
- Kathleen Parker: Repeat, retreat, reload 41
- Letter: Shooter's motives 40
- Letter: Carbon emissions fee 31
- Letter: Brexit shortsighted? 23
- Letter: Panhandlers in Sandy 20
- My view: Taxpayers should call foul on... 19
- In our opinion: Brexit and the U.K.'s... 18
- Charles Krauthammer: Hillaryism: Tired... 17