We can disregard Braden Parker's intense plea to restore the Colorado River until his arguments make more sense ("Save the Colorado River," Readers' Forum, June 2). Glaring deficiencies include his fabricated "energy experts" designating the dam's power output as insignificant, scientifically unsubstantiated water seepage through sandstone and a "tremendous amount of sediment" settling against the dam when actually the sediment settles where the Colorado River enters Lake Powell, 100 miles to the north.
Against the "pros" the major con is Parker trying to con us over to his flawed viewpoint.
Donald B. Gunderson
Salt Lake City
- Five principles to help guide public dialogue...
- My view: Obama has you cornered with K-12...
- Letter: Human body
- Steve Eaton: Sundance the Talking Dog is gone
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: A more...
- My view: Use of force debate should recognize...
- In our opinion: School libraries need...
- In our opinion: Sen. Mike Lee's proposed...
- Five principles to help guide public... 92
- In our opinion: Sen. Mike Lee's... 61
- Letter: Human body 36
- Robert J. Samuelson: The trouble with... 15
- Drew Clark: We need to consider... 15
- In our opinion: School libraries need... 13
- Letter: Transportation component 11
- My view: Obama has you cornered with... 9