We can disregard Braden Parker's intense plea to restore the Colorado River until his arguments make more sense ("Save the Colorado River," Readers' Forum, June 2). Glaring deficiencies include his fabricated "energy experts" designating the dam's power output as insignificant, scientifically unsubstantiated water seepage through sandstone and a "tremendous amount of sediment" settling against the dam when actually the sediment settles where the Colorado River enters Lake Powell, 100 miles to the north.
Against the "pros" the major con is Parker trying to con us over to his flawed viewpoint.
Donald B. Gunderson
Salt Lake City
- In our opinion: National security and the...
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms of...
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment delusion
- My view: They run toward danger
- Jay Evensen: On Second Thought: The 1 percent...
- Is it time for our first woman president?
- Barack Obama: Religious freedom keeps us strong
- Medicare Advantage
- In our opinion: National security and... 66
- Is it time for our first woman president? 55
- Robert J. Samuelson: The false charms... 43
- Letter: Hillary and FOIA 18
- Letter: No labels in 2016? 17
- In our opinion: The lesson of... 17
- Ralph Hancock: The anti-establishment... 16
- Arthur Cyr: US presidential politics... 13