This administration came out opposing military tribunals, wanting to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed in New York, reading the Christmas Day bomber his Miranda rights and trying mightily (and unsuccessfully, there being — surprise! — no plausible alternative) to close Guantanamo. Yet alongside this exquisite delicacy about the rights of terrorists is the campaign to kill them in their beds.
You festoon your prisoners with rights — but you take no prisoners. The morality is perverse. Which is why the results are so mixed. We do kill terror operatives, an important part of the war on terror, but we gratuitously forfeit potentially life-saving intelligence.
But that will cost us later. For now, we are to bask in the moral seriousness and cool purpose of our drone warrior president.
Charles Krauthammer's email address is letters@charleskrauthammer.com.
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- In our opinion: A darkening cloud is hanging...
- Richard Davis: Airlines should do more for...
- Letters: Federal encroachment
- My view: People deserve rights at our borders
- Michael Gerson: Reinvigorating the GOP will...
- Letters: Ending debt
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons



I don’t understand the left’s “morality” on this issue. Obama can assassinate suspected terrorists by executive order without due legal process but President Bush was “evil” for enhanced interrogation of captured More..
Although Krauthammer makes a few salient points and I generally agree with many of his past positions, I do take issue with his general tone and conclusions today. I am no lover of Obama and am anxious to see him leave office as soon as possible, More..
Conservative Scientist, we shouldn't give Pres. Obama credit for ending the war in Iraq. He said he would remove troops starting Day 1 of his presidency - he didn't. Instead he followed the withdrawal plan established by the Bush More..