Deseret News archives
Under the heading "Hatch's Pawn's" (Readers' Forum, May 18), Gerald Larsen goes far beyond expressing an opinion. He also tells us what Sen. Orrin Hatch's attitude is and assigns all voters the role of pawns in some multi-million dollar scheme which Hatch will achieve by not debating Liljenquist.
Oddly enough, as a voter I don't feel "slapped in the face," as Larsen alleges. Nor can I puzzle out how declining to debate will net Hatch "multi-millions" of dollars. As to power, I have always seen Hatch as a servant, and he has always seemed willing to assume that role.
Where's the power in that?
In short, it seems to me that Larsen's letter assumes much, but proves little. In the end, Hatch refuses to debate Liljenquist, which upsets me not at all, despite Larsen's assertions to the contrary.
Salt Lake City
- In our opinion: Trouble on tap? Colleges...
- Drew Clark: Religious freedom is more than a...
- In our opinion: Labor Day revisited
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: How Utah...
- Robert Bennett: Obama has his own 'killer...
- John Hoffmire: Monied interests and democracy
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 45
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Drew Clark: Religious freedom is more... 39
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to... 37
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- Letter: Society puzzles 33
- Join the discussion: Is Common Core... 32
- Jay Evensen: Utahns support Common... 31