The newspapers in this state have done a terrible job of reporting that there is actually a two-party system in Utah and that the U.S. Senate primary on June 26, a closed primary open to only registered Republicans, will elect our next U.S. senator from Utah. I consider this to be absolutely biased reporting.
There is an excellent Democratic candidate running for U.S. Senate in Utah. His name is Scott Howell, and he is a known commodity to both parties, having served as a legislator in Utah for a number of years. All Utah citizens, not just the Republicans, will have a chance to vote for our senator and hopefully select a representative of all the people.
Shame on the newspaper staffs for not reporting on the Democratic Party activities in this state. We had our largest state convention ever, with over 2,500 people attending.
I hope the newspaper staffs will see their error and start doing some fair and unbiased reporting.
Kathleen Dennis
Bountiful
- My view: UDOT listened, made a good choice
- My view: Why moderates lost the caucus vote
- Letters: No welfare, ever
- Lois M. Collins: Kids' summer 'bucket list'...
- In our opinion: Scouting success will come...
- Letters: Move to the center
- Comprehensive immigration reform or bust
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should keep up...
Subscribe
Mobile
RSS
- Letters: No welfare, ever
70 - My view: Why moderates lost the caucus... 32
- Letter: The real death panel:... 30
- Tolerance and the same-sex marriage debate 29
- In our opinion: Big screen exploitation... 25
- Robert J. Samuelson: Can Americans stem... 20
- Richard Davis: Abortion laws should... 19
- In our opinion: Scouting success will... 18
The writer is correct, and this newspaper is a cheerleader for the GOP? Frankly, intervention is needed.
Scott Howell is the real deal. His views align with those of the majority of Utahns, and unlike Hatch and Liljenquist, you won't see him bending over backwards to appease the Tea Party. Hatch has done some good things for our state over the More..
Do you really believe the Dnews has any objectivity? Any at all?
Before it collapsed it was more objective but when it became what it currently is I don't think it can really be called a newspaper any more. More like a religious blog