Laura Seitz, Deseret News
I am very disappointed by Sen. Orrin Hatch's unwillingness to debate Dan Liljenquist prior to the primary election.
I agree with the statement in the Deseret News editorial from May 17: Hatch "has shown he is willing to cynically use his position to block the open and transparent debate his constituents deserve."
I have heard so many say they are voting for Hatch because of his seniority. They are often quick to add that they don't like the "seniority" issue but it is still how politics are done.
I believe Hatch is misusing his power and seniority to do what best serves his political agenda in this election.
I think most people, whether voting for or against Hatch, would like to hear and see both candidates debate. If Hatch is listening to many of the people he is representing, he would be holding a prime time televised debate.
In addition, if Hatch has the talent and ability to lead as he says he still can, he should have no concerns about debating with Liljenquist and an open, issue-oriented debate should be welcomed.
Perhaps it's time to send a new senator to Washington. Is seniority really getting what we want done?
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet
- In our opinion: Par for the president
- 20 of the most influential and innovative...
- Get the names right — or suffer...
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to inversion is...
- Americans are changing their tune on foreign...
- Letter: Our great nation?
- School fees: Is Utah really family friendly?
- Letter: Police brutality 62
- School fees: Is Utah really family... 49
- Mary Barker: Our economic discourse... 43
- Richard Davis: The State Board can do... 42
- In our opinion: A slippery 'immoral' Tweet 42
- Constitutional commitments trump tribal... 35
- Charles Krauthammer: Solution to... 32
- Letter: Society puzzles 32