Laura Seitz, Deseret News
I am very disappointed by Sen. Orrin Hatch's unwillingness to debate Dan Liljenquist prior to the primary election.
I agree with the statement in the Deseret News editorial from May 17: Hatch "has shown he is willing to cynically use his position to block the open and transparent debate his constituents deserve."
I have heard so many say they are voting for Hatch because of his seniority. They are often quick to add that they don't like the "seniority" issue but it is still how politics are done.
I believe Hatch is misusing his power and seniority to do what best serves his political agenda in this election.
I think most people, whether voting for or against Hatch, would like to hear and see both candidates debate. If Hatch is listening to many of the people he is representing, he would be holding a prime time televised debate.
In addition, if Hatch has the talent and ability to lead as he says he still can, he should have no concerns about debating with Liljenquist and an open, issue-oriented debate should be welcomed.
Perhaps it's time to send a new senator to Washington. Is seniority really getting what we want done?
- In our opinion: Despite dip in observance,...
- Turning back the tide of sexual promiscuity...
- Charles Krauthammer: The world according to...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Convention...
- Letter: Medical marijuana
- Letter: Wolves in Yellowstone
- Ralph Becker: Why 'process' matters in...
- Dan Liljenquist: Confronting Saudi Arabia's...
- In our opinion: People desire fair,... 49
- Letter: Constitutional republic 30
- Letter: Utah GOP divided 28
- Richard Davis: Medical marijuana issue... 24
- My view: New labor rule may harm Utah's... 24
- Letter: Respect the governor 21
- In our opinion: Troops in Syria makes... 21
- Robert J. Samuelson: Why tax reform is... 19