Mike Terry, File, Deseret News
After reading Bob Bennett's defense-of-earmarks column, I am totally flabbergasted at his lack of understanding of the reason for his political demise ("It's time to reinstate earmarks," May 7). His philosophy that it is acceptable to confiscate (tax) the hard-earned income of the citizens of this nation so that Washington, D.C., politicians can spread around favors to their friends, family and political cronies is beyond the pale of intelligent reasoning.
For one who voted for and supported the funding of the "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska, he now wants to return to Washington's unconscionable practice, (often times more criminal than legal) of wasteful earmarking. It is beyond the understanding of this common taxpayer.
Neil L. Blackburn
- In our opinion: Perry indictment a concern
- Mary Barker: The real 'Hunger Games' —...
- Carmen Rasmusen Herbert: Families battling...
- Scandals hiding in plain sight
- Jay Evensen: Marijuana acceptance will lead...
- Charles Krauthammer: The role of a great...
- Letter: Irreparable damage
- Join the discussion: Is bipartisanship making...
- Mary Barker: The real 'Hunger Games'... 79
- Robert Bennett: Contrary to Krugman,... 61
- Letter: Utah's birthright 46
- In our opinion: Avoid blurring the line... 46
- Join the discussion: Why is young adult... 42
- Letter: Irreparable damage 42
- In our opinion: Perry indictment a concern 38
- Michael Gerson: Rand Paul's bogus outreach 37