Mike Terry, File, Deseret News
After reading Bob Bennett's defense-of-earmarks column, I am totally flabbergasted at his lack of understanding of the reason for his political demise ("It's time to reinstate earmarks," May 7). His philosophy that it is acceptable to confiscate (tax) the hard-earned income of the citizens of this nation so that Washington, D.C., politicians can spread around favors to their friends, family and political cronies is beyond the pale of intelligent reasoning.
For one who voted for and supported the funding of the "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska, he now wants to return to Washington's unconscionable practice, (often times more criminal than legal) of wasteful earmarking. It is beyond the understanding of this common taxpayer.
Neil L. Blackburn
- Dan Liljenquist: The economic impact of...
- In our opinion: Paul Ryan's promising...
- Join the discussion: Is feminism misunderstood?
- Perceptions of Obama and his policies at home...
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the...
- My view: Utah's Constitution requires state...
- In our opinion: Federal contracting executive...
- Involve Utahns in national monument designations
- Lawrence and Windsor won't trump Utah... 115
- In our opinion: The Affordable Care Act... 79
- In our opinion: The long-term outlook... 51
- Can a news channel 'solve problems'? 50
- Capitalism and the common good:... 41
- Join the discussion: Is feminism... 39
- In our opinion: Timing is right for the... 39
- My view: A global warming solution to... 36