Quantcast

Letters: Value experience

Published: Thursday, April 19 2012 12:00 a.m. MDT

A recent letter said teachers of core subjects should make more money than the other teachers ("Differential teacher pay," Readers' Forum, April 13). Also, the author said a teacher's payscale should not be based on longevity. I would like to address both issues.

All teachers have special gifts they have enhanced through a lifetime of education, practice, and learning. To say that core teachers require more education than the non-core teachers is misleading. Our continual trainings are often performed at our own expense and on our own time. Look at an art, music, history, or even a physical education teacher and see how much time they have spent developing their skill and knowledge in their respected area of expertise. Is their gift less valued?

There is a difference between teaching, presenting basic facts, and the art of incorporating learning. I recently worked with a student teacher who was pretty good with teaching basic facts, but he struggled with engaging the students in learning and also had a hard time controlling a large class. I flashed back to my early years of teaching and saw myself in him. I also struggled with making learning interesting and successful. I also struggled with classroom discipline and procedures. But with years of experience and training offered by the administration, I am so much the better instructor now than I was early in my career. As in any career, with training and experience, older employees are more productive, efficient, and valued. As a result, they have wage increases throughout their careers. Common sense should tell us that a professional employee should make more money based on experience as they hone their gift.

Kevin Wilson

Syracuse

Try out the new DeseretNews.com design!
try beta learn more
Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS