AP Photo/Orange County Register, Jebb Harris
I take issue with Mary Paul's letter opining against the approved disposal of blended nuclear waste by EnergySolutions in Utah as somehow degrading Utah's ability to develop a "safe and inviting environment" ("Say no, or we glow," Readers' Forum, March 28). Many people seem to have an irrational, emotional response to anything nuclear, be it power generation, medicine or waste storage.
It is my understanding that nuclear waste as stored in Utah is solidified, containerized and stored in large burial pits that are clay lined and monitored. As a desert is arid, co-mingling with ground water or rain is minimized and the chance of thermal heating sufficient to create sufficient steam in the form of an explosion to spread contaminated matter is non-existent.
I suggest that the Division of Radiation Control has rationally considered the matter and has made a proper decision. I think that factors impeding the development of a "safe and inviting environment" include the recent number of gang-related robberies and shootings and our inability to somehow co-exist safely with UTA transportation vehicles.
David R. Shorten
Salt Lake City
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Our thoughts...
- 18 of the most heart warming and feel-good...
- Why LDS Church's anti-discrimination stance...
- What one word best describes Barack Obama?
- What The New York Times gets wrong about...
- In our opinion: Fairness for all: Religion...
- Drew Clark: The beams and motes of getting...
- Letter: Slap to our history
- What The New York Times gets wrong... 89
- In our opinion: Fix, don't repeal,... 73
- Michael and Jenet Erickson: Utah... 50
- Mike Lee: Tax reform shouldn't penalize... 38
- In our opinion: Fairness for all:... 38
- Jay Evensen: Will Obama visit Utah? Do... 37
- Why LDS Church's anti-discrimination... 35
- In our opinion: It's time for Utah to... 27