AP Photo/Orange County Register, Jebb Harris
I take issue with Mary Paul's letter opining against the approved disposal of blended nuclear waste by EnergySolutions in Utah as somehow degrading Utah's ability to develop a "safe and inviting environment" ("Say no, or we glow," Readers' Forum, March 28). Many people seem to have an irrational, emotional response to anything nuclear, be it power generation, medicine or waste storage.
It is my understanding that nuclear waste as stored in Utah is solidified, containerized and stored in large burial pits that are clay lined and monitored. As a desert is arid, co-mingling with ground water or rain is minimized and the chance of thermal heating sufficient to create sufficient steam in the form of an explosion to spread contaminated matter is non-existent.
I suggest that the Division of Radiation Control has rationally considered the matter and has made a proper decision. I think that factors impeding the development of a "safe and inviting environment" include the recent number of gang-related robberies and shootings and our inability to somehow co-exist safely with UTA transportation vehicles.
David R. Shorten
Salt Lake City
- In our opinion: The 3 levels of Christmas
- W. Bradford Wilcox: Why the working-class...
- John Florez: Utah's prison relocation is like...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: Cogitating on...
- Carmen Rasmusen Herbert: New Christmas...
- Greg Bell: Socialism vs. the safety net
- My view: Doing away with cursive is bad idea...
- Letter: Patriots or sheep?
- Letter: Patriots or sheep? 62
- Greg Bell: Socialism vs. the safety net 45
- Susan Roylance: Definition of the... 36
- My view: Chaffetz named... 34
- Jay Evensen: Cuba not likely to change... 34
- My view: Torture, morality and the laws... 30
- Jay Evensen: Should Utah raise its gas... 28
- Letter: Police not the problem 24