Because it has a legacy of accomodating conscience, America has developed a rich, participatory civil society that facilitates the efforts of individuals to do what they consider their sacred duty to meet the charitable needs of others. Sometimes the effective and socially beneficial fulfillment of that sacred duty may come bundled with beliefs and practices at odds with other passionately held norms (e.g., Catholic health services and abortion). Would we really wish to forgo the societal benefits of conscience to preserve uniformity?
Accommodating conscience in a religiously diverse society is not simple. It certainly doesn't meet the bureaucrat's need for straightforward application of rules. But it honors fellow citizens as free, equal and conscientious agents who are seeking, with the help of their best lights, to become the authors of a purposeful life. We should feel confident enough in the benefits that derive from genuine liberty and pluralism to welcome and celebrate conscientious objection in its many manifestations.
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- In our opinion: A darkening cloud is hanging...
- Richard Davis: Airlines should do more for...
- Letters: Federal encroachment
- My view: People deserve rights at our borders
- Michael Gerson: Reinvigorating the GOP will...
- Letters: Ending debt
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons



So... may I, out of deeply held personal conviction, now refuse to deal with Mormons who come to me seeking my services?
May I similarly refuse to pay the portion of my taxes that fund government activities I find morally repugnant?
More..
Blue,
I can answer those questions in order.
No, you can't turn away someone because of their beliefs. But if you run a bookstore you aren't required to sell copies of the Book of Mormon.
No, you can't choose which More..
RE: Blue
You should be free to follow to follow your conscience,
and enjoy it's rewards,
and reponsible to accept it's consequences,
and yet the far left who talks of tolerance and compassion,
More..