SALT LAKE CITY — A Utah lawmaker wants to limit the negotiation points in collective bargaining between government bodies and public employees to two issues: salaries and health care benefits.
Rep. Keith Grover, R-Provo — whose day job is an assistant principal in the Alpine School District — says the idea of his HB106 is good public policy and helps school districts and administrators better focus on student performance in the classroom.
“From district to district, there are different things in collective bargaining agreements that for the most part — 95 percent of them — do not focus on student achievement at all,” Grover said. “There’s no focus on student performance.”
Grover said Wednesday he’d really like to eliminate all collective bargaining in the state, but he didn’t want to make a “political statement.”
“This is not an attack, ironically this is not a political move,” Grover said. “Anyone who knows me knows that I’m focused on policy and not so excited about the politics of it.”
He said from a policy standpoint, it’s a good question for taxpayers and others to consider.
“The question needs to be raised — and what the answer is I guess we’ll find out — is why would collective bargaining be allowed for (public employees) to collectively bargain against the taxpayer.”
Grover acknowledged his measure would not be popular with teachers unions, and it isn’t with the Utah Education Association.
UEA spokesman Mike Kelley said the measure “really silences the voice of teachers.”
“There are a lot of things that are critical and important to teaching that are outside wages and benefits that should be discussed and considered between teachers and school boards,” Kelley said.
Kelley referenced a Dan Jones & Associates poll conducted in December on behalf of the UEA and other labor organizations that found the public supported public employee negotiations for things like working conditions over wages.
According to Kelley, the poll found that 81 percent of the 809 households surveyed support the ability of public workers to collectively bargain over wages. Eighty-six percent supported negotiation over health care, while 92 percent supported bargaining over working conditions and 97 percent supported negotiation over workplace safety issues, Kelley said.
Grover anticipates his bill will go before a committee next week, and he expects a healthy discussion.
“I think Utah — we really pride ourselves, being in the Legislature and the citizenry — we really like to think through the issues and question why we’re doing what we’re doing,” Grover said.
E-mail: aadams@ksl.com
- Search for Susan Cox Powell is over, West...
- XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
- Utah State runner Brittany Fisher gaining...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- Warrants issued for 3 suspects in beating...
- 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah Scout...
- Airport TRAX ridership remains strong weeks...
- Mia Love announces she's officially running...
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet,...
66 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
41 - GOP delegates reject changes to...
31 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
21 - Utah facing $1.2 billion-dollar water...
10 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
10 - Fly a flag for Cody: Army confirms Utah...
9 - 1,200 gather in Salt Lake, take part in...
8



This is a great idea and mirrors the hugely successful efforts in Wisconsin to rein in the excessive power of public employee unions.
The teachers unions and state workers will all protest against it and tell us how it will make them More..
The two comments already posted here are completely off topic as to the proposed legislation. First, employees would still have the ability to bargain salaries and health care benefits. Next, retirement benefits are not bargained but rather are More..
Workplace safety issues? What is this, 1920? Workplace safety is already highly regulated by the Feds. The only point of allowing it in collective bargaining is to add one more straw to the taxpayer camel.
Working conditions are More..