10 years later, 'Charly' back in immersion 3D

Lance C. Williams, producer of the original "Charly" film, is adamant about what the new 3D version of the movie is, a version about to be released on the film's 10-year mark.

"This is not just a movie redone in 3D," Williams said. "It's fresh with new scenes and changes to the storyline, plugs in the holes.

"No matter what happens, it's going to be cool!" Williams said. "It will blow the audience' minds."

The 3D-ness isn't the kind that boasts pop-in-your-face images. Williams admits that would be silly for something like "Charly."

"This is the immersion 3D that draws the viewer into the story rather than push the story out," Williams said. "This isn't your father's 3D or what you're used to. It's not effects 3D. It's more like the 3D used in "Avatar."

People see things around them in immersion 3D, Williams explained, so the images will be more natural and have more depth.

He's pumped about the prospect of bringing back one of the most popular LDS films to the market, a film that raked in almost $1 million in 2002 and has been a top DVD seller for a decade.

"We were killed last time going up against 'Sweet Home Alabama' with Reese Witherspoon," he said. "We're making smarter choices this time."

This time out, the March 30 release date to first-run theaters was chosen carefully. It coincides with the general conference for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and does not conflict with the release of the 3D Star Wars movies in February, which was the original target release date.

Since "Charly" is based on the book by LDS author Jack Weyland and has a definitive Mormon theme, it makes sense to release it at the same time that faithful Mormons around the world will be gathering.

From the start, Williams has felt the story of Charlene Riley meeting and falling for Mormon Sam Roberts is a powerful one.

That's saying a lot for a movie guy who has the words "It's the story, stupid!" emblazoned above his office door.

He's called in the original actors to shoot new scenes. This version has the actual conversion on film, something Williams felt was shortchanged the first time around.

"It is the shot. It should have been in the first film," he said. "The changes make for a much more satisfying story."