If a parent was starving a child, and you knew it, you would want the state to remove the little boy or girl to foster care, right? To save his or her life. It wouldn’t just be a matter of food choices or parental rights. It would be a matter of safety, of life and death even. So why do we hesitate in the reverse, when the parent is overfeeding the child and the child’s life is similarly in danger?
The topic of parental rights and severely obese children pinched our collective nerve recently when an article was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that argued that, in the most severe cases, where imminent threat of life-threatening complications is possible, removing the child to foster care should be considered.
That thought, the thought of separating a child from his parents because of his weight, did not sit well with us.
“I feel like it’s opening a Pandora’s box,” author DeAnne Flynn said on "A Woman’s View." “What is mental cruelty? What is sitting in front of the TV watching violence too often? How do you say obesity is more important? Because it’s measurable? I think education is the key.”
“This is probably too much Big Brother,” Crystal Young-Otterstrom from Utah Symphony and Opera agreed. “Where do you say it’s genetics? Where do you say it’s bad food? Where is it the child’s fault, like my husband hides cookies around the house? It’s an education effort. Parents need to learn how they’re hurting their kids.”
Yes. Everyone would agree education is necessary, but at some point you have to talk about safety. Rachelle Call was a social worker and is now an addiction counselor and singer/songwriter. “I actually did remove kids from their homes, not for obesity. I would monitor the situation. It was often a situation of learned helplessness, a generational problem. I would ask myself, ‘Is this going to get better?’ Because the ultimate question is safety. 'Are you safe? Are you safe with the people entrusted with your care?'”
Is a child safe in a home where he or she is morbidly obese and is continually fed food in amounts that don't address the problem? Is that safety? Is that child abuse or neglect? Child abuse or neglect is defined, in part, as “an act or failure to act on the part of the parent or caretaker which presents an imminent risk of serious harm.” Do you consider diabetes an imminent risk of serious harm? Is a 400-pound 12-year-old in imminent risk of serious harm? In the same way that a starving 12-year-old would be? Is that child safe?
- Portland man choreographs elaborate proposal,...
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Valerie Phillips: Going beyond mixes or cans...
- Valerie Phillips: Fond farewell to Morgan...
- Photos: Father on military leave surprises...
- Poverty, hunger among retirees increasing
- 20 best-selling books that weren't as...
- Studies try to find why poorer people...
28 - Combating the negative impacts of...
16 - Poverty, hunger among retirees increasing
16 - Amy Donaldson: Sports is the antidote...
8 - Memorial Day is a time to remember...
4 - About Utah: Story of Salt Lake airmen's...
4 - If you want to live a long time, stay...
3 - New approach tested for high blood...
2






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments