Some Latter-day Saints accept that Freemasonry descends from the
builders of King Solomon's Temple, but that's just a myth, says LDS
author Matthew B. Brown. The evidence actually points to early
Christianity.
Some critics claim that Joseph Smith concocted the Mormon temple
ceremonies after becoming a Freemason, but that's also a myth, Brown
says. The history and richness of LDS temple ordinances cannot be
explained away by comparisons to Freemasonry.
"Exploring the Connection Between Mormons and Masons" (Covenant
Communications, 2009) takes on such myths that keep "critic,
bystander
and Saints alike" from seeing the bigger picture. The book and
companion
DVD documentary appeal to history to demonstrate how Masonry can't
account for LDS temple ordinances.
"We can see better parallels in the ancient world in many ways than
we
see in Masonry," LDS scholar Daniel Peterson says on the documentary.
"Masonry does not account for all the parallels to the ancient world.
...
Does it have something to do with the temple? I think undeniably so.
Does it account for it? Absolutely not."
Brown's book details how modern Masonic scholars say the fraternal
order
did not descend from the builders of King Solomon's Temple, as once
stated in Masonic constitutions. They say the claim is "romantic and
wholly fictitious."
- Is prejudice against Mormons acceptable?
- BYU football: Phil Ford has change of plans;...
- Lights, camera, faith: The Shawn Stevens story
- Arizona woman says first-edition copy of Book...
- Mormon firsts
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Fathers and sons bond at BYU sports camp
- Wright Words: Virginia young women light up...
- Is prejudice against Mormons acceptable?
63 - Arizona woman says first-edition copy...
29 - LDS members divided about Romney-based...
24 - BYU football: Phil Ford has change of...
17 - Lights, camera, faith: The Shawn...
15 - We just know; that's how we decide
7 - Wright Words: Virginia young women...
4 - Michelle King: The priesthood...
4






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments