Apparently, they are fair game.
Sure, these are hypersensitive times, when name-calling or perceived
bias against any group will get you the Don Imus treatment, but you get
a free shot with Mormons. You can say what you want about them with
impunity.
If you denigrate a racial group, you're racist.
If you denigrate women, you're sexist.
If you denigrate Mormons, you're hip.
No one would openly suggest that you shouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton
because a woman can't lead the country, especially an ornery one.
Nobody would dare say that you shouldn't vote for Barack Hussein Obama
because he's black, or of Muslim descent, or because he has a name that
sounds like a terrorist. One Clinton worker even apologized for
alluding to Obama's use of drugs as a youth, so apparently it's wrong
to disparage former drug users, too.
But nobody is shy about saying you shouldn't vote for Romney simply
because he's a Mormon. It doesn't even register on the PC-O-Meter.
Just like that, 6 million Americans have been virtually disqualified
from running for president. They've been rendered second-class
citizens. They're foreigners living in America. They face a glass
ceiling.
How un-American is that?
It would be one thing if most of
- Is prejudice against Mormons acceptable?
- BYU football: Phil Ford has change of plans;...
- Today's misperceptions of Mormonism evoke old...
- Arizona woman says first-edition copy of Book...
- Lights, camera, faith: The Shawn Stevens story
- Mormon firsts
- We just know; that's how we decide
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Is prejudice against Mormons acceptable?
68 - We just know; that's how we decide
31 - Arizona woman says first-edition copy...
30 - LDS members divided about Romney-based...
29 - BYU football: Phil Ford has change of...
22 - Lights, camera, faith: The Shawn...
15 - Today's misperceptions of Mormonism...
8 - Wright Words: Virginia young women...
4






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments