A surprising drop in maternal deaths related to pregnancy was reported this week in a British medical journal, The Lancet.
The 324,900 deaths is a significant drop from the 535,900 deaths
previously reported by the UN World Health Organization — and reported
in my blog "Giving Birth or Not" The new data assessed levels and trends in maternal mortality for 181 countries.
This new data represent a drop in the "Maternal Mortality Rate" from 422 to 251 MMR — which represents significant progress.
International advocacy groups and several UN agencies have used the
previously assumed "lack of progress" toward reducing maternal
mortality to promote "safe" abortions — claiming that fewer women die
from abortion than from childbirth. The U.S. government sponsored a
resolution at the recent Commission on the Status of Women that
asserted that "complications due to unsafe abortions" are a major cause
of maternal mortality — promoting legal abortions in all countries.
This is strongly opposed by Catholic and Muslim countries.
According to an April 13 New York Times article,
pro-choice advocacy groups pressured Lancet's editor, Dr. Richard
Horton, to delay publication of the report until later this year —
"after the current UN Commission on Population and Development (CPD),
the Women Deliver Conference scheduled for this June in Washington D.C.,
and the next UN General Assembly, which is also scheduled to address
maternal mortality." The delay would allow advocacy groups to continue
to use the higher (and deceptive) numbers to push for legalizing
elective abortions at these international policy conferences.
Maternal mortality has become a major focus for achieving one of the
UN's Millennium Development Goals; goal No. 5 focuses specifically on
maternal health. A recent UN Secretary General Report says "there has
been little progress in reducing maternal mortality" in the last 10
Some of you may remember my reports from the Berlin Conference
last year — a 15-year review of the International Conference on
Population and Development. Both UNFPA and International Planned
Parenthood bemoaned the lack of funding for their programs and promoted
a "Call to Action" to be used for increased funding for "reproductive
health services" — including abortion.
However, "This new evidence suggests there is a much greater reason
for optimism than has been generally perceived, and that substantial
decreases (in maternal mortality) are possible over a fairly short
time," according to the Lancet report.
The World Health Organization reports that "History and research
have shown that, although all women and babies need pregnancy care,
care in childbirth is most important for the survival of pregnant
women." Maybe now we can turn our focus toward increasing trained
medical attendants at a live birth, rather than promoting "safe"
Interestingly, "death among men before age 60 is far more common than among females," according to data released this month by the UN Population Division. Obviously, pregnancy is not the only, or most serious, cause of death — since men cannot get pregnant.
- Jerry Earl Johnston: Euphemisms can't capture...
- LDS Church to create Central Eurasian Mission...
- Ground broken for Star Valley Wyoming Temple
- Elder Perry to undergo cancer treatment,...
- 27 more tips for couples: Marriage advice,...
- 'As great as hosting the Olympics': Utah's...
- 21 Shakespeare quotes shared in LDS general...
- Streaming video: Long-awaited Star Valley...
- Q-and-A with Elder Oaks: Protecting... 104
- Defending the Faith: Warfare and the... 63
- Spiritual journey leads 3-term U.S.... 51
- Jerry Earl Johnston: Euphemisms can't... 27
- 5 professional athletes who stand up... 22
- Why is BYU honoring Robby George, and... 21
- Faith leaders call for religious... 17
- The best (and worst) countries for... 16