ACLU seeks to permanently block '05 Utah anti-porn law
SALT LAKE CITY — A group of booksellers, artists and Internet service providers asked a federal judge Wednesday to permanently stop enforcement of a 2005 Utah anti-pornography law.
The Harmful to Minors Act is intended to make Internet service providers, Web hosts and content providers limit the ability of minors to access pornography on the Internet.
The law seeks to regulate all Internet speech that some might consider "harmful to minors," including works of visual art, photography, graphic novels, and information about sexual health and the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth, according to the ACLU of Utah.
U.S. District Judge Dee Benson blocked enforcement of the statute in 2006 after the ACLU and others filed a lawsuit contending the law violates the U.S. Constitution.
"Utah's statute, like those invalidated elsewhere, imposes sweeping burdens on constitutionally-protected speech," said Michael Bamberger, an attorney with Media Coalition.
— Dennis Romboy
- 80 protesters rally at BYU to ask for honor...
- GOP, Democratic lawmakers get testy over...
- Utah becomes first state to declare...
- Greg Miller buys his own car dealership in...
- Study: One in 10 vets with military sexual...
- Social media helps police make arrest in...
- 5 Texans charged with stealing dinosaur bones...
- BYU President Kevin Worthen says university...
- BYU to study Title IX, Honor Code...
57 - Utah becomes first state to declare...
54 - Salt Lake City votes to name road for...
42 - GOP, Democratic lawmakers get testy...
40 - 80 protesters rally at BYU to ask for...
37 - Report: Utah still among the worst...
34 - BYU President Kevin Worthen says...
27 - Salt Lake Tribune to be sold to Paul...
21

State Legislature


Call it the ACLU/Weiner Protection Act~
"Rule of thumb: if the ACLU opposes it, it is probably good
law/policy."
Does that include the dozens of times that the ACLU has gone to bat to fight for
the rights of LDS citizens, students, and missionaries against unjust policies?
Rule of thumb: if the ACLU opposes it, it is probably good law/policy.