Quantcast

Saratoga Springs residents take credit for prosecutor's resignation

Published: Wednesday, April 27 2011 6:41 p.m. MDT

SARAT0GA SPRINGS — A group of disgruntled residents are taking credit for the resignation of a city prosecutor they claim violated their constitutional rights.

During a recent Saratoga Springs City Council meeting, the group demanded that leaders dismiss city prosecutor Lindsay Jarvis and Justice Court Judge Keith Stoney for various alleged offenses.

Jarvis' resignation was announced just days after last week's meeting. But Jarvis said she submitted her resignation a month before and the residents carefully timed their protest to make it appear that she was admitting guilt through resignation.

"This was all an attempt to make it look like they got me to leave," Jarvis said. "I'm not playing these games anymore. I'm tired of being attacked."

She insisted she did nothing wrong, but no longer wanted to deal with the critics.

Saratoga Springs resident Jeff Pierce told council members he'd witnessed Jarvis and Stoney engage in "unprofessional banter" when he went to court hearings for misdemeanor charges that he said dragged on for several months.

"I am concerned about the reputation our … judicial system is earning and how that will affect the growth of our city," Pierce said.

City Council members sat quietly as residents levied allegations. After closing public comment, they said it wasn't time for a back-and-forth but they would discuss the allegations at a later time.

After the meeting, resident Craig Waymon accused Jarvis and Saratoga Springs police detective Bruce Champagne of fabricating allegations that he attempted to hire a hit man to kill the detective. Waymon served prison time for unrelated charges, but has not been charged in any murder-for-hire allegation.

"There definitely was an allegation and a report taken," Saratoga Springs Police Chief Gary Hicken told the Deseret News. "There's nothing else I can say."

In another claim, Elaine Damron-Peltekian said Stoney sent her to jail without due process for being in contempt of court.

Damron-Peltekian was recording her son's court hearing on her cellphone when a bailiff told her to put it away. Her son was in court for misdemeanor charges stemming from a July 2009 loose-dog incident. She claims she stopped recording, held the phone in her hand for a few minutes and put it in her purse.

But the bailiff told the judge that Damron-Peltekian ignored orders and recorded a second time — an allegation she denies.

"I witnessed the Saratoga Springs police officer making up stories to make me appear as though I was not following orders," she told the City Council in a prepared statement.

Damron-Peltekian was sent to jail for a period of about 24 hours for being in contempt of court. She said she never had an opportunity to defend herself.

As a result of the Damron-Peltekian incident, the House passed HB494 earlier this year, a bill to require audio recordings in justice courts. It would have allowed the Judicial Conduct Commission to review complaints from incidents in justice courts. But the bill was defeated in the Senate.

"There's certainly another side to all this stuff," Hicken said. "From what I see, it's nowhere near as described."

On appeal, the 4th District Court in American Fork dismissed charges against the woman's son, Ryan Peltekian. The ruling referenced a resolution adopted by Saratoga Springs in May 2009 that determined animal code violations would be handled administratively and not in municipal or criminal court.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS